14-01-2009, 04:31 PM
Thanks again David.
I am inclined to the Diana was assassinated viewpoint. A producer friend of mine who made three IT3 doco's about Diana's death and they were compelling indeed.
Besides that I was phoned on the evening following her death by another contact and told that all the video footage was missing from the tunnel. This was a long time before this piece of information hit the news and was from someone who had connections. There was a definite concern of "killing" than just "killed" in this individuals mind.
Another member here (that will be you Paul) posted some pics on another forum last year that had various shots of the crashed car. These clearly showed that some of the principal pics had been doctored (as I remember them anyway).
My friend was also told by someone well placed that the "Defence of the Realm" boys were responsible.
Then we must remember all the judges selected to handle the trial followed by their decision to step down. How else can one reasonably conclude from this other than that tampering had been going on? The second (or was it third?) judge to step down was a "grace and favour" recipient of royal largesse (a fact that appeared in the media briefly and then was evaporated completely). Nothing like having distant relatives handling things for you, eh.
Overall I think that as each piece of information is sifted and analyzed objectively, that a strong case can be made for assassinating Diana.
But it will never be proven, of course. Not now. Far too much water has flowed under the proverbial bridge.
I am inclined to the Diana was assassinated viewpoint. A producer friend of mine who made three IT3 doco's about Diana's death and they were compelling indeed.
Besides that I was phoned on the evening following her death by another contact and told that all the video footage was missing from the tunnel. This was a long time before this piece of information hit the news and was from someone who had connections. There was a definite concern of "killing" than just "killed" in this individuals mind.
Another member here (that will be you Paul) posted some pics on another forum last year that had various shots of the crashed car. These clearly showed that some of the principal pics had been doctored (as I remember them anyway).
My friend was also told by someone well placed that the "Defence of the Realm" boys were responsible.
Then we must remember all the judges selected to handle the trial followed by their decision to step down. How else can one reasonably conclude from this other than that tampering had been going on? The second (or was it third?) judge to step down was a "grace and favour" recipient of royal largesse (a fact that appeared in the media briefly and then was evaporated completely). Nothing like having distant relatives handling things for you, eh.
Overall I think that as each piece of information is sifted and analyzed objectively, that a strong case can be made for assassinating Diana.
But it will never be proven, of course. Not now. Far too much water has flowed under the proverbial bridge.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14