16-12-2010, 11:23 AM
That’s very curious Christer. I was just thinking last evening about the picture of the SO19 “police” officer that was published just after the De Menezes slaying.
I remember reading through a “Heckler & Koch” forum at the time, where the posters were largely military, special forces and police. They all largely agreed that the assault weapon the policeman was carrying had been modified in a manner that typically indicated it was the weapon of a special forces soldier. I later tried to locate the picture of the officer to archive but couldn’t find it anyway. It had been removed from every site I checked. This alone points to the Special Forces who don’t allow images of serving soldiers to exist in the public domain.
Then, of course, there is this:
Behind enemy lines....
We are the “enemy” eh. It speaks volumes don’t you think.
I remember reading through a “Heckler & Koch” forum at the time, where the posters were largely military, special forces and police. They all largely agreed that the assault weapon the policeman was carrying had been modified in a manner that typically indicated it was the weapon of a special forces soldier. I later tried to locate the picture of the officer to archive but couldn’t find it anyway. It had been removed from every site I checked. This alone points to the Special Forces who don’t allow images of serving soldiers to exist in the public domain.
Then, of course, there is this:
Quote:he FRR would go ‘deep undercover’ for its reconnaissance, behind ‘enemy’ lines.
Behind enemy lines....
We are the “enemy” eh. It speaks volumes don’t you think.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14