16-12-2010, 12:32 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:David Guyatt Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:Karin Rosander, director of communications for Sweden's prosecutor's office, told the Guardian: "The decision was made by the British prosecutor. I got it confirmed by the CPS this morning that the decision to appeal the granting of bail was entirely a matter for the CPS. The Swedish prosecutors are not entitled to make decisions within Britain. It is entirely up to the British authorities to handle it."
As a result, she said, Sweden will not be submitting any new evidence or arguments to the high court hearing tomorrow morning. "The Swedish authorities are not involved in these proceedings. We have not got a view at all on bail."
The CPS is completely politicized"
Quote:Director of Public Prosecutions
Keir Starmer QC
The CPS is headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Keir Starmer QC, who took up office on 1 November 2008.
As DPP, he is responsible for prosecutions, legal issues and criminal justice policy.
The Director is superintended by the Attorney General, who is accountable to Parliament for the Service.
Actually, the Attorney is completely answerable to, ahem, the Prime Minster who has the power to appoint him and fire him:
The current Attorney General is Dominic Grieve:
He was educated at Magdalen College, Oxford - the same college Bullingdon Boy Georgy-Porgy Osborne attended. All friends together.
The current pro US grovelment is acting on behalf of the United States. As Assange's attorney said a couple of days ago, the Swedish rape accusation is a "holding charge".
On WHAT point of LAW can the Grovelment step in here. Sweden has filed NO charges; the INTERPOL Red Warning was Public, not Secret, as it is supposed to be; the Judge granted bail with the most strict of measures - like someone who is accused of murder or mass murder!.....If Assange is denied to go free today and if there aren't riots, I say pull up the anchor and let the UK sink in its own muck.
And what exactly is it with British University College Clubs - they seem more like organized crime gangs in nice expensive tweeds.
Tsk, tsk dear boy - "point of law"? Whatever is that when it's at home?
The judicial system is politicized remember. The Director of Public Prosecutions answers to the Attorney, the Attorney answers to the Crime Minister, and he, our beloved Cameron,.... he answers to the United States.
This is "The Law" of reality. So please no more word plays about the perception of it all, let's simply stick to what we all know is the actualite, 'kay.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14