26-12-2010, 09:15 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Will post a few like this .....as I have time.....
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?tit...acco_smoke
What is your point? Are you attempting to pretend that merely because polonium 210 may be present, that proves it causes lung cancer? What about the fact that there are an estimated 10,000 carcinogens in ordinary food, including polonium 210? But the bottom line is that it does not entitle you to ignore the fact that there is a known huiman carcinogen called human papillomavirus present in at least a quarter of non-small cell lung cancers. What you're doing is called a smokescreen.
And are you expecting everyone to be indignant merely because someone suggested disputing the anti-smoker claims? That's the nature of a religious inquisition, and it has no place in science.
