31-12-2010, 01:32 AM
Actually Charles there is a lot of evidence to say Cesar was the primary shooter that night.
First, he was in perfect position to deliver the shots into RFK according to Noguchi's autopsy.
Second, he lied about not having a gun similar to Sirhan's.
Third, according to the VOn Pragg tape the shots come to close together to be just SIrhan firing.
Fourth, Cesar's politics were American rightwing--a point the LAPD tried to hide.
Fifth, Cesar seemed to disappear for a few minutes after the shooting.
Sixth, he had powder burns in his eyes. Highly unlikely to have come from Sirhan's gun.
Personally I still think there are too many shots on the tape to be just Sirhan and Cesar. Especially since Uecker pounced on Sirhan right after the first or second shot.
If I had to cast a vote for the third gun, it would be Michael Wayne.
First, he was in perfect position to deliver the shots into RFK according to Noguchi's autopsy.
Second, he lied about not having a gun similar to Sirhan's.
Third, according to the VOn Pragg tape the shots come to close together to be just SIrhan firing.
Fourth, Cesar's politics were American rightwing--a point the LAPD tried to hide.
Fifth, Cesar seemed to disappear for a few minutes after the shooting.
Sixth, he had powder burns in his eyes. Highly unlikely to have come from Sirhan's gun.
Personally I still think there are too many shots on the tape to be just Sirhan and Cesar. Especially since Uecker pounced on Sirhan right after the first or second shot.
If I had to cast a vote for the third gun, it would be Michael Wayne.