21-01-2011, 01:43 AM
Dawn:
I have never put any stock in the Murchison party tale. I once did a lot of work on it and traced the exact line of it. It is all second and third hand stuff that originated with Penn jones, who said he talked to some chaffeur who was allegedly there. It then grew arms and legs until the point that LBJ, Nixon, and if you can believe it Hoover and McCLoy were there. What pure sliced baloney.
And please do not ever even mention Nigel Turner again. How that guy wasted a golden opportunity just completely aggravates me. What a complete goofball he turned out to be. Playing right into the hands of the enemy.
But let us turn to this story above, which now surfaces--how many years after the fact? In the Washington Post of course. WHo is it sourced to? Jack ANderson of course. Felix Rodriguez's best buddy. The guy who had the Watergate story BEFORE IT HAPPENED, and still let it occur. There is a piece of Sy Hersh accomodation for you.
So now, here comes Anderson and Pearson, in the WP guise of 'crusading liberals" now dumping out this story. And this of course is supposed to justify Nixon breaking into Watergate.
Get this, the implication is that the Kennedys paid a 100K, for what? SOmeone to break into some lawyer's office? Come on. Or they paid the lawyer the 100K and he phonied up a break in? Why? Why not just slip the documents to a cut out surreptitiously. Happens all the time.
Anderson had ties to the Hughes corporation for a long time. And this Hughes sloan to Nixon's brother had been out there for years. In fact, Jim Phelan, who also had ties to Hughes, knew about it for long time.
Jack ANderson has been muddying the waters on the JFK case for decades. All the way back to 1967, when he interviewed Garrison and wrote it up for the FBI. He then tried to blame the assassination on Castro by screwing up the whole CIA assassination plot, and then implicating Bobby in the whole mess.
Anderson and the WP, in bed again.
I have never put any stock in the Murchison party tale. I once did a lot of work on it and traced the exact line of it. It is all second and third hand stuff that originated with Penn jones, who said he talked to some chaffeur who was allegedly there. It then grew arms and legs until the point that LBJ, Nixon, and if you can believe it Hoover and McCLoy were there. What pure sliced baloney.
And please do not ever even mention Nigel Turner again. How that guy wasted a golden opportunity just completely aggravates me. What a complete goofball he turned out to be. Playing right into the hands of the enemy.
But let us turn to this story above, which now surfaces--how many years after the fact? In the Washington Post of course. WHo is it sourced to? Jack ANderson of course. Felix Rodriguez's best buddy. The guy who had the Watergate story BEFORE IT HAPPENED, and still let it occur. There is a piece of Sy Hersh accomodation for you.
So now, here comes Anderson and Pearson, in the WP guise of 'crusading liberals" now dumping out this story. And this of course is supposed to justify Nixon breaking into Watergate.
Get this, the implication is that the Kennedys paid a 100K, for what? SOmeone to break into some lawyer's office? Come on. Or they paid the lawyer the 100K and he phonied up a break in? Why? Why not just slip the documents to a cut out surreptitiously. Happens all the time.
Anderson had ties to the Hughes corporation for a long time. And this Hughes sloan to Nixon's brother had been out there for years. In fact, Jim Phelan, who also had ties to Hughes, knew about it for long time.
Jack ANderson has been muddying the waters on the JFK case for decades. All the way back to 1967, when he interviewed Garrison and wrote it up for the FBI. He then tried to blame the assassination on Castro by screwing up the whole CIA assassination plot, and then implicating Bobby in the whole mess.
Anderson and the WP, in bed again.