21-01-2011, 08:02 PM
John Kowalski Wrote:What does this discussion tells us about the state of JFK assassination research? Does it reminds us that after 47 years we still do not have a clear picture of who the initiators, planners and executors of the conspiracy were? We still do not have the names of those persons who initiated the plot and have not defined the relationships between them and those who planned and carried out Kennedy's execution.
John
Does it matter? I mean it is akin to saying "who runs the world?" Behind every David Rockerfeller there are names we do not know. To me what matters is (1) why he was killed and (2)who did not kill JFK. LHO, Castro etc. The false sponsers. We can spin our wheels for the next forty-seven years and we will still be not positive who the killers were.
What we need to do is find a way to educate the public that the media, our schools, our universities etc. have always lied about these matters. We have more than enough proof of conspiracy at the very highest level of movers and shakers.
The internet has been great in eradicating people's false beliefs in MSM.
In my generation the numbers were high almost from the start. Many people knew instinctively that something was amiss, and did not believe the fairy tale. I believe if we can keep this generation interested that they will hit close to 95% who believe in conspiracy fact. The problem I find is for most young people this is ancient history. This is what the conspirators depended upon : time.
Then you get the jerkoffs who push the "who cares?" The Chomskys who insist that there was no reason to kill JFK as he did not threaten the status quo. Or the Sy Hersh types who seek to destroy JFK's reputation as a way to preserve the lie. Sex sells.
But the truth is way more sexy imho.
Dawn