21-01-2011, 11:42 PM
Peter, there has been a veritable mountain-ful of commentary, spin and coverage on this event and I do recall seeing something.... There is already a report in this thread from a sheriff that there was a long-barreled weapon involved, although early reports are notoriously incorrect (just as they are occasionally correct). I am also aware of a comment made of a video I did not watch that suggested that the Judge was involved in the early reactions of attempting to protect others but fell definitively to a wound in the aorta. Did he receive that wound from the Glock and then move to protect another? How long does massive internal trauma to the aorta take before it fells its victim? Not long... but perhaps long enough to allow some ambulatory movement. Don't know, Wasn't there. Post-mortem forensics and investigation can be telling, or can be faked. Police investigation can be critical, or it can be involved in a cover-up.
I will keep an eye out :captain:as I cycle through the coverage in the future.
If I find something pertinent, I will post it.
I will keep an eye out :captain:as I cycle through the coverage in the future.
If I find something pertinent, I will post it.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"

