25-01-2011, 08:56 AM
David Guyatt Wrote:... The implication of the nuclear weapons being made available to the middle east theatre is that they would be used somewhere, but where? The question then arises who was to be blamed for such an atrocity? Iran?
And is nuclear armageddon a strategy now in play?
Nuclear armageddon has been in play for a long time. It's just a question of being able to find justification for firing first, at the right time. The first-strike mentality has been present inside the US for a long time; as a child, I remember the B-58 Hustler's frolicking at 1,000 feet on the western slope of Mt. Greylock along the Taconic ridge. I wrote a "thesis" back in 2007 [ http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/f...7&&st=310# ] that this has been a wet dream of the neo-con movement aided in part by the Israeli war-gaming mentalities. We've seen it historically with JFK and the Unspeakable. It's updated now by missile shields, Star Wars technologies, the launching of the X-37B and its Chinese counterpart, and more.
The issue around the loose nuke is two-fold: a) It is held for a false-flag attack inside the US or perhaps elsewhere? b) Doesn't high-end scientific assay allow some to determine the source of that nuclear weapon after its detonation? And, if so, how will such sampling be prevented?
The big players in this arena are the US, Russia and China; US will hope to find the right moment with a range of technologies such as shields and supremely-fast fighters and bombers, to hit a weak and incapable Russia and/or China. Note the recent UK financial issues in keeping nuclear subs at sea covered temporarily by French assistance. The small players are such states as Pakistan and India, with Pakistani nukes arguably in an insecure state and "local" tempers in an uproar. Add in Israeli tinkering, Iran, Israeli nuclear capabilities, Star Wars directed energy weaponry and shake (don't stir), keeping in mind the old games of "Diplomacy", "Shogun" and treachery in allegiances. Note also the upgraded presence of underground bunkers in both the US and China. Tie this in with the articles on "continuity of government" by Peter Dale Scott. Season with the recently-posted projection of the need for more nuclear subs of both attack and boomer variety.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"