27-01-2011, 10:11 AM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Trowbridge H. Ford Wrote:I do think that Peter Presland should also have included my critical comments about John Young before he passed along my explanation of why I know that the Pentagon has the ability to create man-made earthquakes.
The best confirmation of it is the fact that Cryptome.org belatedly posted the 16-part series that I wrote about it during 2009-10 - what he must have gotten even more heat from viewers than what my article has drawn here. Young was persuaded to post the series in aiding and abetting the Pentagon and CIA attempt to prove that I was either working for a foreign intelligence agency, especially Iran's, or that I was a leaker of secret information from some spy, probably Tehran's.
Young had even spurred me on in such endeavors by meeting me in NYC in June 2009, warning me that the Agency was again out to get me - what it had done back in Portugal during 1995-96 when it tried to make poisoning me to death for criticising Clinton's treatment of former President Nixon, Al 'Deep Throat Haig, and former DCI Richard Helms at the White House look like a natural death.
Of course, Young's warning just pushed me harder on the matter, and what Washington hoped to fix me up with, like Amir Aldabili, when I came the States in late August for a seven-week stay, near where it would be easy for me to snoop around Livermore National Laboratory and Thomas Reed's residence in Healdsburg. Young refused to see me either coming or going for fear of being drawn into the entrapment, and not wanting to take up any time while in NYC so I would more likely visit the Iranian Legation to the UN.
In short, I know that this confirms what I claim, and if they had been successful in countering, I would have been locked up for the rest of my life.
And I do find it funny that critics here only talk about earthquakes being made in ways my explanation avoids, and that I am insulting the Iranian intelligence service - what I consulted when dealing with Washington's attempts to entrap me - when I called it Savak, implying only that its network going back to the Shah's time must be the base for murdering its enemies, especially covert operators like John Wheeler III.
Trowbridge - welcome to DPF, and thank you for your comments.
At the heart of your claim that Iranian intelligence assassinated Wheeler is the assertion that the Americans have deliberately engineered earthquakes to sabotage or delay the Iranian nuclear programme. This is a key part of the rationale you provide for the death of Wheeler.
As I stated in my original post, I am sympathetic to the idea that certain countries possess the technological capability to create earthquakes. However, the engineering of specific named earthquakes is stated as fact in your article, so it is surely correct that the evidence for that part of your argument is critically examined.
In your post above, if I understand correctly, you claim that the CIA and/or Pentagon has attempted to frame you, Trowbridge H Ford, as an agent of Iranian intelligence. Regardless of the truth or falsity of that claim, it is relevant to at least consider it given that you are now claiming that Iranian intelligence assassinated Wheeler for his sabotage of the Iranian nuclear programme.
In response to my criticism of your use of the defunct name Savak to describe C21st Iranian intelligence, you wrote as follows:
Trowbridge H. Ford Wrote:And I do find it funny that critics here only talk about earthquakes being made in ways my explanation avoids, and that I am insulting the Iranian intelligence service - what I consulted when dealing with Washington's attempts to entrap me - when I called it Savak, implying only that its network going back to the Shah's time must be the base for murdering its enemies, especially covert operators like John Wheeler III.
Are you stating that your use of the name Savak was not erroneous, but was deliberate? And that you implied by its usage continuity with the intelligence service of the Shah?
Jan, since you have behaved in a civil manner, I shall start answering your questions.
The use of the term Savak was deliberate, and I believe most strongly that there was continuity between the Shah's past and Wheeler's assassination.
The best evidence, in my opinion, is the unexpected suicide of Ali-reza Pahlavi on January 4, 2011 in Boston. He was much less interested than his older brother Reza in seeing the monarchy restored. He just wanted to see Iran become a democratic state which honored human rights.
I found it most intriguing when the writer of "The Suicide of Alireza Pahlavi: A Revolt Against Forced Exile" put these thoughts in the mind of the deceased:
"I'll do something that has nothing to do with me because the assumption is that I don't exist anymore. I could do something for the people for which I am suffering that would take me up to death."
So what did he do which led him to quietly take his own life?
I am working on the assumption that he somehow established a sting on Wheeler because of what he had done to his Iranian people. A meeting was arranged at the hotel in Wilmington on December 29th, I think, where Alireza's security guards got what they wanted after they drugged Wheeler when he arrived at the appointed roon, and stole his Blackberry, brief case, and mobile phone.
After they checked out their contents, they gained entry to his house, possibly with more assistance by Ali-reza, and after they got all the information they could from Wheeler, they killed him, and disposed of his body, thinking that it would never be found.
When it was found, Ali-reza, instead of enjoying some satisfaction for having gotten rid of Iran's worst tormentor, had to hurriedly commit suicide.
The reaction of Washington and Tehran to the suicide was most unexpected too.
More in the article I am now writing.