28-01-2011, 12:20 AM
This following is a post on 911blogger. It explains a misleading title from The Telegraph's article. Follow links for video and postings of this article.
The UK Telegaph reacts to the Richard Falk case:
[B]"UN Human Rights Official Claims 9-11 Was US Plot"[/B]
[NOTE: The headline the Telegraph chose to use, "UN Human Rights Official Claims 9-11 Was US Plot." is inaccurate and misleading, and is reproduced and preserved here at 911Blogger because of the significance of it being employed by a mainstream media institution like the Telegraph.
In his blog post Richard Falk did not "claim" or "suggest" that "9/11 was US plot" or that the "US government may have orchestrated the September 11 terrorist attacks." What Falk said was, there are "awkward gaps and contradictions in the official explanations," there was "an apparent cover up", and there are "well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials." - loose nuke]
This article was placed today on World For 9/11 Truth, and appeared first in The Telegraph, also today. Pretty good exposure to have this in The Telegraph. URL: http://world911truth.org/un-human-rights...s-us-plot/It will be interesting to watch how the US press, and world press, handles this developing story, particularly if he does, indeed, get fired.
For more information see this source link for this 911blogger post:
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-01-25/un...as-us-plot
Jonathan Mark
Flyby News9-11
The UK Telegaph reacts to the Richard Falk case:
[B]"UN Human Rights Official Claims 9-11 Was US Plot"[/B]
[NOTE: The headline the Telegraph chose to use, "UN Human Rights Official Claims 9-11 Was US Plot." is inaccurate and misleading, and is reproduced and preserved here at 911Blogger because of the significance of it being employed by a mainstream media institution like the Telegraph.
In his blog post Richard Falk did not "claim" or "suggest" that "9/11 was US plot" or that the "US government may have orchestrated the September 11 terrorist attacks." What Falk said was, there are "awkward gaps and contradictions in the official explanations," there was "an apparent cover up", and there are "well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials." - loose nuke]
This article was placed today on World For 9/11 Truth, and appeared first in The Telegraph, also today. Pretty good exposure to have this in The Telegraph. URL: http://world911truth.org/un-human-rights...s-us-plot/It will be interesting to watch how the US press, and world press, handles this developing story, particularly if he does, indeed, get fired.
For more information see this source link for this 911blogger post:
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-01-25/un...as-us-plot
Jonathan Mark
Flyby News9-11
In first 3 minutes, watch
9/11 - WTC-7 - Exposed!
Video clip produced by Robert Bowman
National Commander, ThePatriots.US
"Building what?" - Judge Edward Lehner
upon hearing mention of WTC Building 7
Watch The Ad One Million New Yorkers Will See:
BuildingWhat.org
[URL="http://www.ae911truth.org/"]1,421 Architects and Engineers
Call for New 9/11 Investigation[/URL]
[URL="http://www.flybynews.com/cgi-local/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1014738186,11057,"]9/11 Investigation vs New World Order
Perspective - Resource - Archives[/URL]
9/11 - WTC-7 - Exposed!
Video clip produced by Robert Bowman
National Commander, ThePatriots.US
"Building what?" - Judge Edward Lehner
upon hearing mention of WTC Building 7
Watch The Ad One Million New Yorkers Will See:
BuildingWhat.org
[URL="http://www.ae911truth.org/"]1,421 Architects and Engineers
Call for New 9/11 Investigation[/URL]
[URL="http://www.flybynews.com/cgi-local/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1014738186,11057,"]9/11 Investigation vs New World Order
Perspective - Resource - Archives[/URL]