27-01-2009, 04:42 PM
Thanks, Gil, for yet another important contribution to our shared search for the truth.
As far as LHO's alleged ownership of CE 139 is concerned, I submit that the burden of proof is assumed by those who accept such nonsense as fact.
See:
http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/...d.php?t=37
and
http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/...d.php?t=38
As far as LHO's alleged ownership of CE 139 is concerned, I submit that the burden of proof is assumed by those who accept such nonsense as fact.
See:
http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/...d.php?t=37
and
http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/...d.php?t=38