Article: How Khan was set up

[Peter Presland]

I'm following the inquests quite closely.

All we get from the MSM is the expected reinforcement of the official narrative - heart rending tales of suffering; stirring tales of selfless bravery; hate-stoking tales of the wickedness of the perpetrators whose identities are known with absolute, unquestionable certainty.

But beneath the theatre of it there have been startling confirmations of many more absurdities in that by now 'cast-in-stone' ON - and it's not over yet.

Among the more egregious of them, confirmation by the police under close questioning and under oath, of two things:

• They first identified the suspects and their mode of travel to London, using ID information from forensic reports on items collected at the various explosion scenes.
  
• that they were led to Luton Station and the alleged bombers parked cars by those same forensic reports which - wait for it - they did not receive until nearly 48 hours later.
  

There are at least 6 other anomalies as glaring as that, NONE of which has been pursued at the inquest, with the witnesses involved now dismissed. They mainly concern evidence that the explosives HAD to have been placed directly on or under the floor to explain the damage caused, but that the only witnesses claiming to have seen 'suspicious males with rucksacks' (though no positive ID's from any) stated that immediately prior to explosions the rucksacks were held in their owners laps - several attempts to get them to say 'on the floor', but none successful. The police diagrams also place each bomber further away from the damage epicenters - and by a considerable margin - than many of the named and questioned passengers who survived the blasts with relatively minor injuries, whilst the alleged remains of the alleged bombers were unrecognisable as human remains at all - I could go on, use of special mobiles being another rich source of comedy - and all of these are additional to gross anomalies well known prior to the inquests in, for example, the nature of the explosives and the number of explosions.

Nick Kollerstrom spends a lot of time on all this. In spite of my fairly serious spat with Bridget Dunne (Webmaster of the 7-7 Truth site), she has a very good forensic brain and posts good stuff on the 7-7 blog by way of analysis. I would be most surprised if - soto-voce - she is not revising her stubborn refusal to see our SIS's for what they are - that or she's been made an offer she can't refuse of course.

I correspond with Nick and hope to meet up with him in London soon.

The big BIG problem is this: I have no more doubt that 7/7 was an operation planned, facilitated, steered and executed by the UK/US Deep State Nexus than I have about the same for 9/11. From what I know now, it's simply a no-brainer. That being so, it's also a no-brainer that the same Nexus will 'use all its power' (aka Michael Corleone to Kay) to prevent its exposure - and they are playing this in deadly earnest and for keeps - big-boys rules.

I am already sensing that serious further pursuit of this thing could become dangerous.