Met Police Agent Provocateurs

[Jan Klimkowski]

There may be something in this - but I doubt that a German anti-fascist group is sponsored "by offshoots of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation".

Meanwhile, ACPO plc's professional "infiltrators" (undercover assets) are being transferred to line management by the Metropolitan Police Special Branch. No meaningful change there then.

Also, there has been a fair amount of coverage of the story in other British newspapers, eg:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthne...ement.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/hom...92787.html

And the Daily Mail printed a sympathetic puff piece cum exclusive interview (for which Kennedy/Stone was allegedly paid a lot of money). It can be seen - deconstructed - earlier in this thead.

It is natural, if arguably naive, that members of protest movements would tell their stories to The Guardian. And as a result, Guardian hacks have the best first hand accounts of Kennedy/Stone and other agents provocateurs. Access to first hand testimony enables a newspaper to lead coverage of a story.

This is how newspapers and MSM work. No conspiracy there.

My judgement remains that this is a very embarrassing story for the British deep state because it establishes, unequivocally, for the public domain record, that dozens of undercover assets have been "infiltrated" into protest groups during the past decade, and that these undercover assets have both incited, and provided material support, to criminal actions.

The basic cost to the taxpayer is £250k pa per undercover asset, plus the cost of buying materiel for protest actions, as Mark "Flash" Stone is alleged to have done.

The notion that the deep state is engaged in false flag activity in the C21st, and that such behaviour is not confined to history, is established.

The next time a spooky correspondent turns up on the BBC or Sky, and claims "this not the kind of thing our chaps would get up to nowadays", their utterances will be demonstrably false.