13-02-2011, 02:40 AM
Anyone can visit the thread and discover how convincingly my position--
namely, the same one represented by David Lifton--has been vindicated.
namely, the same one represented by David Lifton--has been vindicated.
Greg Burnham Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:Monk,
Send me a link, if you don't mind, and I'll take a look. Thanks for posting.
Jim
QUOTE=Greg Burnham;35401]James H. Fetzer Wrote:Well, life is short and I am spending more of it that [sic] I would prefer on one or another web site. I disputed DiEugenio's claims on the original MASTERMIND thread, so I don't mind that Lifton has proven I was right. It may put you to sleep, but some of us care about the difference between truth and fiction.
Jim,
Although I agree with what you just wrote, in general terms, and in "person specific terms" as well, regarding Jim D, -- still, Robert Charles-Dunn has very eloquently pointed out several flaws in Lifton's reasoning regarding the "blackmail-vulnerability" of JFK. I think RCD's reasoning is much more compelling than is DSL's in this regard.
Jim,
Check for the link posted in my previous message above. It's post # 159 in that link...here:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....218&st=150
And the argument continues in many subsequent posts.