18-02-2011, 02:35 AM
No thanks.
I have advocated for an accurate "reading" of the visual evidence, something that neither Wood or Fetzer is capable of and clearly you are not as well.
Many in the truth movement also fail to see the destruction for what it is and propose explosive controlled demolition when it is not required to explain what we observe. There likely was a kick off energy input to get the runaway collapse of the floors going. But once that was underway, it was unstoppable. It broke the facade apart which fell away, stripped the core columns of most of its lateral bracing and it too finally collapse from Euler buckling. You can see all that core steel in the photos taken after the collapse.
If you are not educated how to see, you don't understand what your eyes behold.
I have advocated for an accurate "reading" of the visual evidence, something that neither Wood or Fetzer is capable of and clearly you are not as well.
Many in the truth movement also fail to see the destruction for what it is and propose explosive controlled demolition when it is not required to explain what we observe. There likely was a kick off energy input to get the runaway collapse of the floors going. But once that was underway, it was unstoppable. It broke the facade apart which fell away, stripped the core columns of most of its lateral bracing and it too finally collapse from Euler buckling. You can see all that core steel in the photos taken after the collapse.
If you are not educated how to see, you don't understand what your eyes behold.