18-03-2011, 09:57 PM
Albert Doyle;36910[/QUOTE Wrote:OK Charles then explain to me what happens if one of the Oswalds is arrested or even killed by a Richard Case Nagell type? Or an Otepka type who decides to blow Oswald's cover?
If my aunt had testicles she'd be my uncle.
What is a Nagell "type"? An Otepka "type"?
But let's get back to basics:
Why was JFK killed in Dallas?
Why was LHO picked as the patsy?
Was Vallee part of the false defector program? Touched by HTLINGUAL? An applicant to Albert Schweitzer College? Did he marry a blood relative of a GRU officer? Was he rubbing elbows with LCN-connected "types"? Pro-Castro Cubans? Anti-Castro cubans? Was he an FBI informant?
Were there a Thomas Arthur Vallee AND an Arthur Thomas Vallee?
Was Chicago in the home state of a prime False Sponsor and important Facilitator?
Was Chicago in the home state of the vice president?
Is it believable that assassins of the sort required to hunt and kill a president would leave their weapons in the open for a landlady to discover?
Are you aware that all intel ops have at least two objectives?
Albert Doyle Wrote:The functionality of Chicago as both a set-up for Dallas AND - OR - a real assassination need not be mutually exclusive. You have to expand your thinking here to CIA dimensions.
My friend -- and I do not use the term flippantly -- I'll stack my imperfect yet refined thinking about deep politics in general and the JFK case in particular against almost all comers.
You might expand your own appreciations of the case and its milieu by pondering my questions above and then answering them.
And while you're at it, define "CIA dimensions."
Albert Doyle Wrote:And this has nothing to do with Douglass.
Then stop trotting him out to bolster the unbolsterable.
Albert Doyle Wrote:The Russia/Cuba red-dipping of Oswald made him a better patsy, but if you think about it they never used it. Well, maybe in the cover-up with the WWIII virus but never directly.
Which is like saying, "They never used guns. Well, maybe to shoot him."
Albert, I don't know how to respond to these levels of misunderstanding and self-contradiction. You really do need to get back to basics.
Albert Doyle Wrote:With Vallee they could have just claimed a brain-damaged right-wing Kennedy hater killed him because of the Bay Of Pigs.
Albert, "they" also could have put the heart attack drug in JFK's chateaubriand.
But they didn't.
Because killing JFK was just one of many objectives of the operation.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene