26-03-2011, 04:16 PM
I think there should be a review of how exactly this "asymmetrical" war came about? There's serious question of the legality of this and there has been no review to see whether or not the war was based on behind the scenes CIA manipulation in order to incur a "surprise" democratic movement. There's has been zero legal review to see if this war was illegally manipulated as part of greater war actions in the region for Israeli and US interests.
What I can't understand is how those other arab countries would jump on board so quickly with what is a movement that works against their interests? Is it like a mafia-type thing where they sell out another don in order to gain advantage for themselves? Is the US promising rewards for backing their attack? And how, after being called "irrelevant" by the US, is the UN jumping-in on the side of the violators again? I don't get it? Who runs the UN? This kind of massive one-sided attack is exactly what the UN was formed to prevent.
There's been zero review of whether or not this was a CIA-instigated and armed "revolution" as part of a regional campaign known as the "War On Terror," its more accurate name being the colonially-illegal "Project For A New American Century" fascist movement.
There's no doubt that how CIA interprets "asymmetrical" is their being able to get away with this dirty business. What they mean by "asymmetrical" is CIA and the State Department being able to get away with crimes against the American people and their democracy.
What I can't understand is how those other arab countries would jump on board so quickly with what is a movement that works against their interests? Is it like a mafia-type thing where they sell out another don in order to gain advantage for themselves? Is the US promising rewards for backing their attack? And how, after being called "irrelevant" by the US, is the UN jumping-in on the side of the violators again? I don't get it? Who runs the UN? This kind of massive one-sided attack is exactly what the UN was formed to prevent.
There's been zero review of whether or not this was a CIA-instigated and armed "revolution" as part of a regional campaign known as the "War On Terror," its more accurate name being the colonially-illegal "Project For A New American Century" fascist movement.
There's no doubt that how CIA interprets "asymmetrical" is their being able to get away with this dirty business. What they mean by "asymmetrical" is CIA and the State Department being able to get away with crimes against the American people and their democracy.