01-04-2011, 04:37 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:For the record, Fetzer posted a blurb for the Farrell book on Spartacus.
That is where I got that part of the post.
And I did mean Family of Secrets of course.
His defense of his endorsement of the Nelson book is hapless. Summed up it says that Douglass showed why the villains wanted to kill Kennedy. Nelson then showed us how they did it.
This is as short sighted as his endorsement of Turner using Barr M.
It misses the point that Douglass applies no conspiratorial role to LBJ!!!
Douglass is pretty clear on who he thinks killed Kennedy. (And if you did not understand that then you did not read the book carefully.) And its not LBJ. I mean what the heck did LBJ have to do with Chicago? Or the Raleigh call? Or Bernard Haire?
But the thing about Douglass is this: No one could ever question the quality of his research or his sources. Which is something I congratulated him on. Now, if you do a qualitative comparison of Douglass' sources with Nelson's, I mean, are you serious?
The irony is, I actually think he is.
Yes its pretty darn scary alright. I reckon you should email this thread for Jim Douglas to have a laugh over.