03-04-2011, 07:10 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-04-2011, 08:06 AM by Seamus Coogan.)
Bernice Moore Wrote:quote; seamus I heard it straight from those involved with the forum simply put that Jim Fetzer and Lifton were banned from it. i take that as membership...i believe the last go around we had you mentioned a similar phrase..giving the same impression.i explained if you can comprehend, that Debra wants to and has moved on,as many have, but there you are trying your damdest to stir the shite,that's what your here for read your latest post that about says as much, as far as i am concerned Deb is Lancer.so i refer to the whomever passes onto you, the garbage or part of the garbage you continue to spill.not she but some in the membership. clear finally, read what you write,...you do go on so, don't you, a nerve must have been struck no matter your objections...
quote''It's through the studies of what I consider the best research available that I have come to my own conclusions. Unlike others I admit that sometimes their ideas clash in particularly Weisbergs take on Garrison. Thanks to the work of Lane and Weisberg I disliked Fetzer's gibberish a long time before I joined up with Lancer and CTKA! '' ( now that's too bad isn't it, but you object apparently to he as well as others coming to their own conclusions whose ideas clash with yours..as for Weisberg and other names you drop, he was amongst the best imo...and fought a great fight..and his work continues to..THE REST OF YOUR WINDY REPLY I FIND IS NOTHING TO REPLY TO, JUST BLOWING MORE SMOKE, FOR ATTENTION...to carry on your sermons.carry on seamus, you write like you are so very important in your own eyes, i think you may lay off somewhat the mentioning too often of jim and lisa's names as well, you seem to enjoy the dropping of names a little too much imo...too bad THE REST OF THE RESEARCH COMMUNITY HAS NOT KNELT DOWN TO YOUR OVER ZEALOUS LOUD MOUTHED CONCLUSIOS, AND CONTINUES TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES, THEY HAVE NOT ASKED FOR NOR NEED YOU TELLING THEM ANYTHING, SEE FOR A LONG TIME, BEFORE YOU APPEARED THEIR WORK WENT ON AS IT WILL WHEN YOU DROP BY THE WAYSIDE, FROM WEARING YOURSELF OUT, BY YOUR CONTINUING EFFORTS TO TELL ALL WHAT THEY CAN AND SHOULD BELIEVE, TOO BAD BUT THAT'S THE WAY IT GOES, YOU NEED TO DO A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT MORE OF GROWING UP YOUNG MAN, YOU TALK AND PONTIFICATE STILL LIKE THAT SCHOOL BOY, WITH SOME GOSSIPY JUICE TO PASS ALONG, YOU AND MORROW MUST GET ON WELL IN THE SCHOOL YARD YOU HAVE CREATED FOR YOURSELVES.....THANKS FOR THE COME BACK, AN THE CAPITALS ARE ALSO INTENTIONAL...THEN PERHAPS YOU MAY COMPREHEND, THAT NOT MANY IF ANY GIVE A HOOT WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO PREACH...OR BUYING YOU ARE NOT THAT IMPORTANT THOUGH YOU CERTAINLY GIVE THE OVERWHELMING IMPRESSION YOU WOULD LOVE TO BE, .. YOU ACCUSE OTHERS OF DOING,WHAT YOU DO, HAVE YOU LOOKED IN THE FORUM OF LATE AND REREAD WHAT YOU WRITE, YOU REPEATEDLY PREACH, AND TELL THEM WHAT THEY SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT BE INTO,AND WHOM TO BELIEVE ALONG WITH YOUR INSULTS, GO BACK AND DO SOME REFRESHING HONING OF YOUR OVERZEALOUS TECHNIQUE THAT YOU USE IN YOUR POSTS BEFORE YOU CONTINUE TO AGAIN PREACH TO ANYONE ELSE...PS I AM PLEASED TO READ YOU HAVE FRIENDS OUTSIDE OF THE RESEARCH WORLD, YOU GIVE THE IMPRESSION, YOU NEED THEM, BUT A WORD OF ADVICE DO NOT TRY TO TELL THEM WHAT THEY SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT BE DOING, OR YOU WILL SLIP ON THE PEEL AGAIN...HAVE FUN IN THE SCHOOL YARD...B
The sad thing about all this is that for some reason you have adjudged myself as someone with the impression of not being at fault in any sphere. That is grossly absrud and untrue. You also failed to acknowledge that ultimately you-yes you yourself ran Lancer through the mud and failed to acknowledge my ties to the organisation and the fact I heard little of what you said I had.
However I will not bare a grudge. This whole debate between you and I is hilarious. Quite simply because you have taken a postion of austerity that is ultimately archaic and hypocrital. Yes Bernice, thats the reality and the reason why I put my words in caps in my PREVIOUS POST was so you would read them. And as it seems that you did not the first or second time hell maybe a third. Furthermore I did not put my entire reply in caps. For you to reply soley in capitals was extremely 'school yard'
How old are you 50-60? Im around 34 sorry, but well it shouldn't be me telling you to grow up. I showed one my friends (outside JFK) your post for a giggle and they thought you were very funny they agreed I could also be a stubborn so and so!
Ultimately, the argument rests with this new book by Zirbel the show pony. You agree with Miss Brown. I don't. Theres nothing 'personal' on Brown. She herself is a matter of public record. I don't dislike her Im not out to 'get' her. Bernice she did what she did! The issue is that she was on the record as being an unreliable liar and her party story was a provable fiction.
Oddly enough to the best of my memory Zirbel never even mentioned her in his first book. Zirbel is the issue here. So lets put this pathetic war of semantics behind us and start discussing the back and forth properly.