14-02-2009, 09:36 PM
How very true.
At another widely respected -- if somewhat problematic -- forum on which deep political subject matter is discussed, a notorious correspondent who in fact is merely an empty vessel through which higher ranking acolytes of the Unspeakable spread their propaganda recently began to venture into JFK territory.
For years this persona has served to deflect, dilute, and otherwise disrupt pages devoted to 9-11 research and, in general, subjects that draw the Unspeakable's attention. But it has not been applied to JFK assassination discussions until now.
On cue, otherwise well-intentioned and, in some cases, even learned JFK researchers are being drawn into debate with this persona -- for the sake of clarity let's refer to it as Big Nicotine.
The only morally acceptable response is to continue to expose Big Nicotine for what it is -- as I have done repeatedly on the aforementioned site. I have exposed its nature as a vessel for multiple posters by noting its absurdly wide and instantly applied arrays of expertise and laughably inconsistent usage of the English language. Others who regularly post on these pages have done likewise.
Yet Big Nicotine continues to wreak havoc at the other forum and elsewhere.
Given the background of Big Nicotine's legend, or overt persona, we should not be surprised. As the name I've chosen for him indicates, he is the spawn of one of the Unspeakable's most reprehensible errand boys.
Lest anyone doubt the presence of the Unspeakable among us today.
At another widely respected -- if somewhat problematic -- forum on which deep political subject matter is discussed, a notorious correspondent who in fact is merely an empty vessel through which higher ranking acolytes of the Unspeakable spread their propaganda recently began to venture into JFK territory.
For years this persona has served to deflect, dilute, and otherwise disrupt pages devoted to 9-11 research and, in general, subjects that draw the Unspeakable's attention. But it has not been applied to JFK assassination discussions until now.
On cue, otherwise well-intentioned and, in some cases, even learned JFK researchers are being drawn into debate with this persona -- for the sake of clarity let's refer to it as Big Nicotine.
The only morally acceptable response is to continue to expose Big Nicotine for what it is -- as I have done repeatedly on the aforementioned site. I have exposed its nature as a vessel for multiple posters by noting its absurdly wide and instantly applied arrays of expertise and laughably inconsistent usage of the English language. Others who regularly post on these pages have done likewise.
Yet Big Nicotine continues to wreak havoc at the other forum and elsewhere.
Given the background of Big Nicotine's legend, or overt persona, we should not be surprised. As the name I've chosen for him indicates, he is the spawn of one of the Unspeakable's most reprehensible errand boys.
Lest anyone doubt the presence of the Unspeakable among us today.