14-02-2009, 10:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 15-02-2009, 09:09 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
"Lest anyone doubt the presence of the Unspeakable among us today."
Charles, I personally think they [that's 'they'] have proliferated in numbers and one can't doubt their presence at any point in history from day one to tomorrow! Given their increased numbers, we must redouble our efforts to fight them. This is the ultimate battle - for the truth of history and the morality [I'd even say existance] of the future. All must stake their picket-pins in the ground and fight to the end - refusing to move, unless it is forward. The Unspeakable in 1963 was childsplay compared to today, IMO. No change in substance, only in its effect and power over the society and planet, at large. From the day the first witnesses started to speak the truth and the first critics began to criticize, they [that's 'they] have inserted themselves, invented experts and writers on the subject, false witnesses and tampered and killed real one, etc. Douglass should take it as a backhanded compliment - they feared his book and truth enoughtve to have to try to neutralized it. You can't neutralize the Truth, only obscure it temporarily - and the longer one does so, the greater ther price to be paid [often by the wrong persons, sadly].
Charles, I personally think they [that's 'they'] have proliferated in numbers and one can't doubt their presence at any point in history from day one to tomorrow! Given their increased numbers, we must redouble our efforts to fight them. This is the ultimate battle - for the truth of history and the morality [I'd even say existance] of the future. All must stake their picket-pins in the ground and fight to the end - refusing to move, unless it is forward. The Unspeakable in 1963 was childsplay compared to today, IMO. No change in substance, only in its effect and power over the society and planet, at large. From the day the first witnesses started to speak the truth and the first critics began to criticize, they [that's 'they] have inserted themselves, invented experts and writers on the subject, false witnesses and tampered and killed real one, etc. Douglass should take it as a backhanded compliment - they feared his book and truth enoughtve to have to try to neutralized it. You can't neutralize the Truth, only obscure it temporarily - and the longer one does so, the greater ther price to be paid [often by the wrong persons, sadly].