11-05-2011, 05:16 PM
Greetings, Simon,
Let's take a deep breath.
As one of the leaders of the charge to ridicule the "LBJ-as-prime-sponsor" disinformation and expose it as such, I should check in with a few words of advice.
1. One cannot hope to understand the "who" and "why" of the assassination without first gaining a solid grasp of the "how" it was undertaken. Once you understand the basic physics, if you will, of Dealey Plaza and the factors prompting the selection of LHO as the "perfect patsy," you can utilize a process of elimination to narrow your range of "who" suspects.
2. One cannot hope to understand the "how" absent a working conspiracy model for the JFK event (and certain prior and subsequent deep political conspiracies). Please research this forum for threads in which such a model (the "Evica-Drago" model) is proposed and discussed.
3. The proper elimination of LBJ from the Sponsors level of the Sponsors/Facilitators/Mechanics conspiracy model and his proper insertion into the Facilitators/(False Sponsors) level will follow upon close, learned deep political analyses of these matters.
4. If "follow the money" was the Watergate investigation mantra, then "question the timing" must be the mantra for this and related deep political inquiries. So ask yourself: Why is the LBJ-as-sponsor disinformation building momentum now?
5. Beware the bear traps of False Choices and meaningless rhetorical arguments. Proponents of the preposterous, poisonous LBJ-as-sponsor position will argue that, since clearly he was a prime player in the cover-up (I agree with that evaluation), LBJ must have been a Sponsor, or prime mover, of the assassination.
They will not offer working definitions of "Sponsor" or "prime mover." Nor will they describe their own conspiracy model from which their investigations begin.
Rather, they will attempt to force you into a False Choice: LBJ as Sponsor, or LBJ as innocent of involvement. Don't fall for this nonsense.
6. Don't rush to judgment regarding the identification of Sponsors.
You have much work to accomplish.
If you need assistance, don't hesitate to ask via this forum.
Best of luck,
Charles
Let's take a deep breath.
As one of the leaders of the charge to ridicule the "LBJ-as-prime-sponsor" disinformation and expose it as such, I should check in with a few words of advice.
1. One cannot hope to understand the "who" and "why" of the assassination without first gaining a solid grasp of the "how" it was undertaken. Once you understand the basic physics, if you will, of Dealey Plaza and the factors prompting the selection of LHO as the "perfect patsy," you can utilize a process of elimination to narrow your range of "who" suspects.
2. One cannot hope to understand the "how" absent a working conspiracy model for the JFK event (and certain prior and subsequent deep political conspiracies). Please research this forum for threads in which such a model (the "Evica-Drago" model) is proposed and discussed.
3. The proper elimination of LBJ from the Sponsors level of the Sponsors/Facilitators/Mechanics conspiracy model and his proper insertion into the Facilitators/(False Sponsors) level will follow upon close, learned deep political analyses of these matters.
4. If "follow the money" was the Watergate investigation mantra, then "question the timing" must be the mantra for this and related deep political inquiries. So ask yourself: Why is the LBJ-as-sponsor disinformation building momentum now?
5. Beware the bear traps of False Choices and meaningless rhetorical arguments. Proponents of the preposterous, poisonous LBJ-as-sponsor position will argue that, since clearly he was a prime player in the cover-up (I agree with that evaluation), LBJ must have been a Sponsor, or prime mover, of the assassination.
They will not offer working definitions of "Sponsor" or "prime mover." Nor will they describe their own conspiracy model from which their investigations begin.
Rather, they will attempt to force you into a False Choice: LBJ as Sponsor, or LBJ as innocent of involvement. Don't fall for this nonsense.
6. Don't rush to judgment regarding the identification of Sponsors.
You have much work to accomplish.
If you need assistance, don't hesitate to ask via this forum.
Best of luck,
Charles