Discrediting Secret Service complicity in the elimination of JFK…

[Seamus Coogan]

Seamus,

No one knows sin better than a sinner knows it.

That being noted, I must take the strongest possible exception to your post here.

In the past I have led many charges against Rigby's Greer-related hypothesis. And I am on record with my contempt for what the EF has become -- a disinformation bazaar of the most contemptible order (in spite of the presence there of a handful of honorable and accomplished researchers).

Further, often I have been less than charitable when taking on individuals whose intellectual failures -- honest though they may be -- in my opinion play into the hands of the JFK assassination's Sponsors and/or Facilitators.

But your characterizations ("lunatic") and comparisons to cartoon characters ("Peter Griffin") of Rigby and others do not rise above the level of churlish schoolyard taunts. In addition, dragging in the likes of Carroll and Vaughan is wholly unprovoked within the discernable context of a post which seems devoid of thematic or literary merit.

(Let it be noted that years ago on the EF I was the object of the former's poison pen. I dealt with him deftly and moved on, and I harbor no affection for the man.)

I'm afraid that when you accuse others of being guilty of "unsophisticated schtick" you prompt the unavoidable response, "Physician, heal thyself."

Seamus, here it is in a nutshell: If you wish to make the case that Rigby is an agent provocateur, then do so. We're listening.

If you wish to expose the failures of his Greer argument, the floor is yours.

And keep in mind -- in the forefront of your mind -- that I would not support removal from the DPF of your post which I find to be devoid of merit and wholly counter-productive to our shared missions.

But this sort of swill you're spilling seems to be coming directly from a Foster's oil can.

You're better than this.

Knock off the bullshit.

CD

CD. I knew this would raise some hackles. Fairs fair.

I assure my next posts won't be so visceral.

But you go and take a look at the BS Jim, Lee Farley and others have been subjected too on that forum. Phew weee and I'm the one outta line here? The gross lies and distortions and continuing streams of insults (unfettered by any semblance of regret I might add) is something extraordinary.
I think your moving on from here CD is the case in point. Which I was trying to make. Rigby obviously had not. But as per usual mate you are correct. It was not well written and I shall re-edit the above post.

I am not making any claims to anyone being anything other than intentionally malicious and nasty individuals, I think that theres certainly potential for their being disinformation. But theres more too them being akin to the sad caricatures like the people I have mentioned.

It's about time the three of them collectively got a smidgen back of what I feel they deserve. But if these individuals wanna dish it out distort and effectively play games on any and all platforms. And then not have the 'nads' to ever front up too places like here on a well moderated platform and debate with people like say you, Lee (he should sign up) or Jim Di (It's you guys-people I admire I want to see debate the points-not myself) then what are they?

They're the ones with the BS problem not me and I'll stand by that. But I'll also take my licks from all the decent fair minded people here on this forum (almost everyone on it) if they think what I say is unfair. Like I say I've said my piece. If any of them ever front back over here to discuss or debate the issue I assure you I will not leap in and will respect the wishes of the mods like yourself.