9/11 Live Airplane Composite Theory

[Ed Jewett]

Mr. Burnett, if you would, please summarize what you believe to be Mr. Jewett's failures of intellect and/or nerve.

I've not suggested Ed is lacking in either intellect or nerve, nor do I assume anything of the sort. For all I know he could be a genius with balls of steel, but I take issue with those who promote claims they are unwilling to scrutinize themselves regardless.

Kyle, I can assure you I don't have balls of steel, and as for intellect, I graduated from public high school and attended a large state university, from which I emerged with a GPA just a whisker over 2.0 and a bachelor's degree earned over a period of 13 years; I had to wrestle the diploma out of the hands of the Dean.

Along the way, I have lost more than a few synapses. (Luckily, those things are plastic, I'm told.)

And I've been looking at and discussing the issue of 9/11 in online discussion formats since Feb 22 2006 at 11:31 PM. When that discussion got contentious, after I sought out David Ray Griffin and he and I combined to make a post in rebuttal to an outlandish claim about him, I was accused of stretching the rules of online debate beyond a reasonable norm, and so I formed another discussion board. So I bet I've seen some similar theories about video manipulation. My neck is already well-extended on the topic of 9/11.

As noted, I am involved in a heavy investigative reading project of my own that requires a lot of time while I simultaneously -- well, you aren't on the list of people who need to know how I spend my time.

I did note (did you?) that the link from which the video and argument was taken had at least seven prior posts on the same matter.

You have said that you would be happy to oblige in discussing the matter, so have at it. The floor is yours. State a thesis, or tear this one down.