9/11 Live Airplane Composite Theory

[Peter Lemkin]

I find more compelling than total video fakery [that no planes or drones hit the WTC 1 & 2, but a film was made to make it appear so], that it might not have been the flights advertised, or the planes were not standard planes, or that drones of similar size and form were substituted, or even that the 'real' flights were directed into the buildings - although I doubt that under the control of real hijackers.

911 is a complex matter, but not so complex it can't be determined; nor at this point that honest and intelligent/diligent persons can't decide if the official version is truth [not]or fairy tale [totally]. The details, I think, are slowly falling into a better assemblage of the puzzle pieces.

Some people get locked into their own theories and won't give ém up, even when the theory doesn't fit the evidence. Others are, sadly, but predictably, spouting knowingly false and confusing alternate theories [as was done with Dallas and all the other high-profile citizen investigated events of Deep Politics], in order to muddy the waters and create doubt and confusion for those not immersed in the subject and even some so immersed.

In my mind a good researcher will be willing to change their viewpoint and theories, as new information emerges. I know I have on 911 and even a little on Dallas - no major changes; just tweeking/tacking as new info comes to light. Some ideas, however, I find do not even engage me; and on their face seem to be either luny or disinfo.