Tarpley on 9/11 - a key video...

[Peter Lemkin]

Good digging Jan. Chaney is as likely in someways involved in some levels of the events of 911 than not IMHO. Rice would only be after the fact IMHO used by others who ran that op. I agree that the sources are all rather tainted, HOWEVER, some of the details spelled out in Tarpley [and others] writings of the movements and events of Bush's day on 911 are very strange, indeed. He apparently did not trust the 'Government' and ran like a frightened rabbit from one secure nuclear launch coordinating facility to another, before eventually returning to D.C. What he told the people and what he did there is not known, but he could well have been telling them [there is some shreds of evidence to this effect] to NOT launch any nukes without absolute proof the command came from him in person or by some other means of identifying it was him - and not others who had the codes for the day. It does seem that Bush was kept out of the loop and purposely frightened; at the school not given SS cover, as prescribed [and as Chaney got]. The 911 Commission, of course, didn't even touch this stuff - in fact they hardly touched what happened outside of the Government that day and only told the fairy tale version of events. It was an easy sell to Bush's single neuron that Al Quida had 'done it'. I'm sure he was convinced of it - despite its absurdity; not being supported by the available fact; and a Frankenstein creature of our own construction and funding. The COG events, the cover-up, the wargames, the stand-down and the Anthrax attacks [to name a few things] are key to understanding what really happened and that the official version and the truth only overlap in that they talk about the same day.