05-06-2011, 05:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2011, 08:08 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Deniers try to schmooze Barrett's insistence that he saw Oswald's ID's and wallet at the Tippit scene into Barrett mentioning it later on at the police station. That's what they do. They aren't afraid to impose outrageous assumption over obvious fact. What SV attempts above is to say there was a wallet laying on the street next to where Tippit was shot but none of the arriving officers took a look at its contents. What these connivers fail to explain is exactly how Tippit's wallet could fly out of his back pocket as he went to confront the man he was talking to. People like SV get so caught up in their lies they fail to realize that for Westbrook to mention the name "Alek Hidell" at the Tippit scene would mean he had to have looked in the wallet because at that point in time there was no means by which Westbrook could have known about that name except for Oswald's wallet and its fake ID's. I think our ghoulish prevaricator realizes this so he tries to push the mention of Hidell over to the police station.
Never once do these people admit that these multiple wallets popping-up conforms exactly to a doubles operation where Oswald was being set-up.
Nor do they admit the post-controversy over this is the sign of FBI blatantly covering-up yet another case of incriminating evidence.
Never once do these people admit that these multiple wallets popping-up conforms exactly to a doubles operation where Oswald was being set-up.
Nor do they admit the post-controversy over this is the sign of FBI blatantly covering-up yet another case of incriminating evidence.