The LBJ-Did-It Operation Continues to Unfold

[Seamus Coogan]

Of course LBJ 'didn't do it'.

LBJ was the ideal vehicle for those who 'did it'. He represented a once in a lifetime historical opportunity. That's why the coverup persists 38 plus years after he died. Those who 'did it' have maintained the coverup because they control the mainstream discourse.

Even to the uninterested observer, a brief glance at LBJ's career reveals who he answered to:

1. Operation Texas in the late 1930's (one of his few honourable acts).

2. Potentially career threatening advocacy of Israel's occupation of the Sinai during the Suez crisis in 1956/57, including a personal rebuke of President Eisenhower's position on the crisis.

3. His 'council of wise men' (Zionist ideologues).

4. Coverup of Israel'sl attack on the USS Liberty in 1967.

5. Overseeing the consolidation of Israel to regional nuclear armed superpower.


Israel killed JFK and Jack Ruby's rabid Zionist loyalies is proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Israel, and only Israel, tangibly benefitted from JFK's death.

America's failure to face this fact has led it into its current disastrous political, social and economic disaster. You can't see it because you are a nation totally enslaved. You've been hypnotised.

I reckon JFK would agree with me.

This is where it really pays to be careful.

I think the whole Israeli-Jews killed Kennedy stuff is extremely borderline.

I personally don't buy it either. Because the evidence IMO just does not bear it out.
Israel were dissapointed in Kennedy disagreeing with their nuclear program hmmmm. Well they had to wait a long time before they got them circa 1967. I also think it's dangerous saying anyone outside the US 'group' or 'religious' body did it. It's as bogus as the Lyndon Johnson gibberish. That's not to say something funky went down with the USS Liberty however. But trying to tie that in with JFK is something of stretch. It also sends one down a very slippery slope. I had a brief discussion with Al Doyle in regards to this and I was to busy too finish off what I was trying to say (my apologies Al). I recall when Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas were interviewed on the 'Democracy Now' show with Amy Goodman.

One of the saddest things I saw was that the duo from Popular Mechanics got off on their high horses accusing Bermas and co of being 'anti-semitic'. Now this just came out of nowhere and I was utterly appalled. I advise anyone to read John Ronson's 'Them: Adventures With Extremists' in which he discusses this problem. The cool thing is that Ronson himself is of Jewish ancestory and found the ADL particularly confused in it's mission. I'm no big fan of Chomsky nowadays either, but I think he's correct that they have lost the plot in regards to any form of criticism being labelled as a racist attack.

But this brings me too my point. I'd be slightly jumpy as well if I'd faced pogroms of the kind the Jewish people have experienced throughout history. Sadly, it appears that conservative Zionist elements have hijacked a lot of the discourse in much the same way Christian elements have hijacked or targetted many debates. These guys represent the views of a minority of Jewish people. A lot of excellent JFK researchers were Jewish and many, many Jewish people are opposed to illegal Israeli occupations in Gaza and recognise the rights of Palestinians. Not to mention that Jewish people living elsewhere in the middle east were also very critical of official Israeli policy.

The big danger is of course the growth of lunatic conservative Christian movements in the US (again not all Christians are lunatics or conservative either) in particularly the Christian Zionist groups. Any form of religious extremism is exceptionally bad for your health and that of others. This whole Israel behind the assassination stuff sadly wreaks of the very bigotry that people in groups like the ADL lap up. As for Ruby, he's something of a false sponsor himself.