06-06-2011, 05:26 PM
Yes. One "position" or perspective does not necessarily rule out the other. I don't think the thesis is that no planes hit the Towers. The issue may be precisely what plane (or other airborne object made to look like a plane) hit the Towers. Is it possible that some of the people and companies involved in the background have, in their portfoiio, the ability to take a real airplane and make it look like another real airplane, said maskirovka then concealed in part by video hijinks? In short, is the plane(s) that hit the Towers (and we might extend this to other locales) actually the registered and documented aircraft that was supposed to have taken off that morning?
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"