9/11 Live Airplane Composite Theory

[Ed Jewett]

Kyle, the part that I find interesting about it is simply this: steps would need to be taken, and perhaps were taken, to enable a maskirovka. [I assume you are familiar with the Russian word, or the concept of a Potemkin village, the use of rubber tanks on the shores of the UK to fool the Luftwaffe into thinking there was a massed army venturing to land at Calais, etc.] Why would it be important to mask an airplane people had clearly seen, from street level or nearby buildings, plow into the WTC? Well, at about 550 mph at distances that varied, it might be very difficult to identify precisely what type of aircraft it was. "A large jet", in most cases, "like a commercial jet", would suffice, especially in light of the power of the media to tell the tale, and in light of the skills already in place in making things appear, or appear to be different, in various intelligence agencies. But on TV, with wide screens, high density, replay, and frame-by-frame retro-analysis, there might be certain features we wouldn't want recognizable. Keep in mind no plane parts with trackable ID tags have been made part of the forensic record.

There are theories out there -- I'm sure you've seen them, as an ardent student of 9/11 -- that suggest that the flights in question never took off, never boarded, etc. Some of these have been addressed or posted here or in other threads. But if you will look to a map and find the spot near where a cabal was involved in a military act of pressure, causing the commander-in-chief to wear his spectacles for the first time in front of his troops and avert the matter with a passionate appeal, you may find further clues right nearby. I speak of the winter encampment of the Continental army in Newburgh, NY, right near the spot where the two airplanes that hit the Towers were alleged to have 'almost collided', right near an airport with a very long runway and an interesting history, and located just 60 miles above Manhattan. [Let's see, at 500 mph, 60 miles would take less time than you will reading this post and its links.]

The air facility in question used to be a USAF base
(http://dmna.state.ny.us/forts/fortsQ_S/s...ceBase.htm)
and is now both a National Guard facility
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Air...Guard_Base)
and a privatized airport (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Int...al_Airport).

The near-collision (http://911anomalies.wordpress.com/2007/0...orce-base/) is alleged in some circles to actually have been the switcheroo (which shell is the pea under?).

The mechanism and actors involved in the switched are explained by the controversial investigator Christopher Bollyn here: http://www.bollyn.com/the-planes-of-9-11-2 ....

Is Bollyn right?

Go back and re-check the web site for the International Airport and see who maintained a hangar there. (You may find some wolves, keys and bones in the archives.)

The activity involved in the switcheroo gambit could easily have been masked in part because "Stewart was one of the many regional airports to be used during the Emergency Ground Stop after the September 11th Attacks, taking in dozens of planes forced to land."