The LBJ-Did-It Operation Continues to Unfold

[Seamus Coogan]

I understand and deeply appreciate your own understanding of this case, Vasilios.

Like Seamus, I hesitate to attempt to name the true sponsors of the assassination other than to engage in a process of elimination -- an ultimately flawed process that cannot hope to deliver us to our common destination.

Thank you Charles i appreciate that.
Evica's essay Perfect cover had a profound impact on my thinking.
Below i present an excerpt from this essay:
Who Killed JFK?

The initiating order was the U.S. Establishment, the Ruling Class, the Power Elite, the National Security State: the anti-JFK personae in Big Oil, banking, defense and their Intelligence and Military assets. Driven by both real and opportunistic anti-Communism, the Establishment aimed at reducing union strength, reducing production costs, and increasing the power of its "military-industrial complex" with its outposts in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Western Europe.
Specifically, the initiating order was inside the complex of corporate and financial institutions of the Rockefeller-Morgan-Mellon alliance: the advisors, associates, and partners of David Rockefeller. But rather than acting as the Big Boss of the assassination, David Rockefeller energized the actual initiators by continually attacking JFK's philosophy and politics through public statements published in a compliant media from 1961 on. David Rockefeller was the perfect upper-echelon patsy, the up-front standard-bearer, urged on in his attacks on JFK by the assassination decision-makers.
What the Rockefeller-Mellon-Morgan power elite perceived in JFK's administration was a managed economy with wealth distribution driven by a strong president. The initiators, having decided that JFK had to be eliminated, sent their contract through D.C. power brokers (for example, Irving Davidson and Robert Maheu) to the facilitating order.

What i don't understand is why he calls David Rockefeller the perfect upper-echelon patsy, the up-front standard-bearer.

Vasilios. I was unaware that GME had written this. But it sums up kind of how I feel. I do think this Rockefeller thing is a bit weird it's never sat well. What I think GME is driving at is kind of how McCone was steering the CIA ship and was the figure head while the power or those using the CIA were really the ones in command. I dunno if I'm completely right. But hmmmmmm thanks for bringing it up man all very interesting and this debate has certainly gone up another gear. It also turns Johnson into the veritable 'pin prick' he was!