29-06-2011, 06:36 PM
That was supposed to read something like "when or if enough of them leave the former organization in an act of secession, allowing the former organization to wallow in its own ineptitude".
I got out of the management/enterprise studies when my boss borrowed my heavily-annotated copy of "A Passion For Excellence" and wouldn't return it. She bought me a new one. :banghead:
The problem with secession is that ineptitudinally-inclined organizations get subsidized, bailed out, learn to group together, or subscribe to the same management theory circles. Another is that secession or revolt too often becomes a habitual cycle, and the revolutionary gets labeled, or black-listed, or at least identified as someone who will not "go along to get along".
I got out of the management/enterprise studies when my boss borrowed my heavily-annotated copy of "A Passion For Excellence" and wouldn't return it. She bought me a new one. :banghead:
The problem with secession is that ineptitudinally-inclined organizations get subsidized, bailed out, learn to group together, or subscribe to the same management theory circles. Another is that secession or revolt too often becomes a habitual cycle, and the revolutionary gets labeled, or black-listed, or at least identified as someone who will not "go along to get along".
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"