Seamus, it's clear we have some basic difficulties in communicating. But your last post is closer to an honest expression of my intent, post, inquiry, idea, thesis, (whatever you want to call it).
What I think I have said is this:
I am doing some reading in depth; that reading is long, arduous, incomplete, on complex and controversial subjects in which there is limited information as it is deeply historical (borrowing on and burrowing in language and expression patterns not of modern day America) and which by definition has been secret and has been suppressed, and on which new information is emerging every year.
The long-dead beloved President, the subject of intense inquiry, once gave a speech on secret societies; there is some difference of opinion on what he meant in that speech and whether in fact he was talking about the history of the Illuminati, Skull and Bones, nefarious dealings under the table in finance and government, or other conspiracy -- in the true etymological or legal meaning of that word -- or whether he was talking about the dreaded Commies.
I suggest, based on my understanding and my incomplete reading, that the charming fellow in question -- when he gave that speech -- may well have been very much aware of the history of the Illuminati, Skull and Bones, nefarious dealings under the table in finance and government, or other conspiracy.
Furthermore, there is every indication that the "Commies" are involved... not in the assassination, save for the obvious roles in re: Oswald... but in the histories of secret societies in Europe.
Now, none of this suggests (thus far-- I reserve the option) in any sense that there is [COLOR="purple"]a direct linkage between Freemasonry, the Illuminati, secret societies, or Skull and Bones and the assassination of this charming fellow[/COLOR].
I do not see Illuminati symbology carved into the grass on the knoll, the walls of the School Book Depository, or in the patterns of the sewer grates when overlaid on the railroad/street map.
However, there clearly is a series of indirect links (insufficient in a court of law, but we are no longer in a court of law) that do not constitute "proof"; however, there is ample information that suggests a clear attitudinal parallel between secret societies and intelligence agencies considered suspect in the assassination, and there are clear and bluntly obvious links between the creation and leadership of the dominant intelligence agency and the secret society that is at the heart of the discussion.
The presence on the membership rolls of S&B for the first six-and-a-half decades of the 20th century (as revealed in a cursory examination) of
* two key people in the Choate school;
* eight people involved in psychological operations of one kind or another;
* five people in the Foreign Service (not including the heavy hitters);
* at least five or six involved in pharmaceuticals, public health, epidemiology, etc.;
* lots of people involved in the liquor distribution business (as was the father of the charming fellow);
* ten in high positions in the Federal Reserve;
* nine associated at high levels with Brown Brothers and Harriman;
* seven associated with or related to the Rockefellers;
* four associated with the Rothschilds;
* several associates of McCloy;
* five from within the Bush family (including Prescott and GHWB);
* sixteen holding serious rank in inside the military; and
* an additional twelve involved in military intelligence; and
* numerous people in high positions in the media;
warrants further concern, inquiry, research and thought.
What I think I have said is this:
I am doing some reading in depth; that reading is long, arduous, incomplete, on complex and controversial subjects in which there is limited information as it is deeply historical (borrowing on and burrowing in language and expression patterns not of modern day America) and which by definition has been secret and has been suppressed, and on which new information is emerging every year.
The long-dead beloved President, the subject of intense inquiry, once gave a speech on secret societies; there is some difference of opinion on what he meant in that speech and whether in fact he was talking about the history of the Illuminati, Skull and Bones, nefarious dealings under the table in finance and government, or other conspiracy -- in the true etymological or legal meaning of that word -- or whether he was talking about the dreaded Commies.
I suggest, based on my understanding and my incomplete reading, that the charming fellow in question -- when he gave that speech -- may well have been very much aware of the history of the Illuminati, Skull and Bones, nefarious dealings under the table in finance and government, or other conspiracy.
Furthermore, there is every indication that the "Commies" are involved... not in the assassination, save for the obvious roles in re: Oswald... but in the histories of secret societies in Europe.
Now, none of this suggests (thus far-- I reserve the option) in any sense that there is [COLOR="purple"]a direct linkage between Freemasonry, the Illuminati, secret societies, or Skull and Bones and the assassination of this charming fellow[/COLOR].
I do not see Illuminati symbology carved into the grass on the knoll, the walls of the School Book Depository, or in the patterns of the sewer grates when overlaid on the railroad/street map.
However, there clearly is a series of indirect links (insufficient in a court of law, but we are no longer in a court of law) that do not constitute "proof"; however, there is ample information that suggests a clear attitudinal parallel between secret societies and intelligence agencies considered suspect in the assassination, and there are clear and bluntly obvious links between the creation and leadership of the dominant intelligence agency and the secret society that is at the heart of the discussion.
The presence on the membership rolls of S&B for the first six-and-a-half decades of the 20th century (as revealed in a cursory examination) of
* two key people in the Choate school;
* eight people involved in psychological operations of one kind or another;
* five people in the Foreign Service (not including the heavy hitters);
* at least five or six involved in pharmaceuticals, public health, epidemiology, etc.;
* lots of people involved in the liquor distribution business (as was the father of the charming fellow);
* ten in high positions in the Federal Reserve;
* nine associated at high levels with Brown Brothers and Harriman;
* seven associated with or related to the Rockefellers;
* four associated with the Rothschilds;
* several associates of McCloy;
* five from within the Bush family (including Prescott and GHWB);
* sixteen holding serious rank in inside the military; and
* an additional twelve involved in military intelligence; and
* numerous people in high positions in the media;
warrants further concern, inquiry, research and thought.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"