11-07-2011, 03:08 PM
The problem with Mr. Fetzer is he is clearly a copy and paste kinda guy and then throws in some flawed "it-looks-like-a-duck" thinking which he passes off as "scientific analysis".
This "it-looks-like-a-duck" thinking is what is crippling real scientific inquiry as truthers are convinced that even a four year old can understand what they see... it's so obvious!.
Unfortunately this along with the way Hollywood has dumbed down most people to how the world actually works is a major barrier to scientific inquiry into 9/11. What you get is pseudo science by "high school" teachers who want to use 911 as a lesson in Newton's laws... but fail to bother to look at all the physics which refined and carried his work further... and resulted in engineering practice which in many cases is based on empirical testing.
Garbage in = garbage out
This "it-looks-like-a-duck" thinking is what is crippling real scientific inquiry as truthers are convinced that even a four year old can understand what they see... it's so obvious!.
Unfortunately this along with the way Hollywood has dumbed down most people to how the world actually works is a major barrier to scientific inquiry into 9/11. What you get is pseudo science by "high school" teachers who want to use 911 as a lesson in Newton's laws... but fail to bother to look at all the physics which refined and carried his work further... and resulted in engineering practice which in many cases is based on empirical testing.
Garbage in = garbage out