20-07-2011, 03:23 PM
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:So who DID send the command or directive to remove security? Where is the actual proof of this directive?
I am not alleging that this was not the case. I just haven't seen what I would call reliable evidence as opposed to hear say.
Jeffrey,
You will find a "directive" ordering the standing down of air defense security on 9-11 within approximately 39 hours of finding a "directive" ordering the standing down of motorcade security on 11-22-63.
In re the former, we are left with two conflicting inferences: Either al Queada got lucky and executed their attacks at the precise time when multiple air defense exercises created optimum conditions for successful strikes, OR -- if you'll excuse the technical jargon -- the fix was in.
In re the latter, we are left with two conflicting inferences: Either Oswald got lucky and executed his attack during the "uniquely insecure" presidential public appearance when multiple protection procedures were withdrawn for benign purposes yet to be revealed, OR -- if you'll excuse the technical jargon -- the fix was in.
If you abandon the positions of the Coincidence Conspiracist and instead choose to conduct a deep political inquiry -- that is, one based upon the conclusion that the event under scrutiny is of a deep political nature -- you must eschew the naif's question and ask the specialist's question.
The naif's question: Who ordered the security stripping?
The specialist's question: Who could have ordered the security stripping?
Then follow the specialist's question with the unavoidable variation: Who among the suspects could not have ordered the security stripping?
Charles