20-07-2011, 10:42 PM
Arnon Milchan as facilitator for JFK the film, the catalyst for The JFK Records Act, arguably a greater attack on the root than all the government Aunt Polly's Fence committees.
In my early examination of the five volumes of Douglas Horne's Inside the ARRB I note Custer's Last X-Ray:
Douglas Horne, Inside the Assassinations Record Review Board, Volume II, Chapter Five: The Autopsy X-Rays, pages 530-2:
Custer Examines the X-Rays of the Body
The noteworthy highlights of Custer's review of the x-rays of the body was Jeremy's attempt to see whether Custer could identify metal fragments near any of the cervical vertebrae, which Custer had mentioned earlier in the deposition.
Jeremy showed Custer x-ray no. 9, a view of the chest prior to removal of the lungs, and the exchange went as follows:
Gunn: Previously, you referred to there being metal fragments in the cervical area. Are you able to identify any metal fragments in this x-ray?
Custer: Not in this film.
Gunn: Does this film include a view or an exposure that would have included such metal fragments?
Custer: No sir.
Gunn: Where would the metal fragments be located?
Custer: Further up in there. This region.
Gunn: Can youand you're pointing to?
Custer: Up into the, I'd say, C3/C4 region.
Jeremy asked Custer to review x-rays no. 8 and 10, of the right shoulder and chest, and left shoulder and chest, respectivelyboth are images following the removal of the heart and lungs. Custer could not identify metal fragments in either x-ray.
Later, Jeremy asked Custer the following questions:
Gunn: Now, you had raised, previously in the deposition. . .the possibility of some metal fragments in the C3/C4 range.
Custer: I noticed I didn't see that.
Gunn: You didn't see any x-rays that would be inthat would include the C3/C4 area?
Custer: No sir.
Gunn: Are you certain that you took x-rays that included theincluded C3 and C4?
Custer: Yes, sir. Absolutely.
Gunn: How many x-rays did you take that would have included that?
Custer: Just one. And that was all that was necessary, because it showedright there.
Gunn: And what, as best you recall, did it show?
Custer: A fragmentation of a shell in and around that circular exitthat area. Let me rephrase that. I don't want to say "exit," because I don't know whether it was exit or entrance. But all I can say, there was bullet fragmentations [sic] around that areathat opening.
Gunn: Around C3/C4?
Custer: Right.
Gunn" And do you recall how many fragments there were?
Custer: Not really. There was enough. It was very prevalent.
Gunn: Did anyone make any observations about metal fragments in the C3/C4 area?
Custer: I did. And I was told to mind my own business. That's where I was shut down again.
Gunn: You have, during the course of this deposition, identified three x-rays that you are quite certain that you took, but don't appear in this collection. Are there any others that you can identify as not being included?
Custer: That's the only three that come to my mind right now; the two tangential views, and the A-P cervical spine.
Gunn: Okay.
Custer: Can I add something to that?
Gunn: Sure.
Custer: In my own opinion, I do believe, basically, the reason why they are not here is because they showed massive amounts of bullet fragments.
~~~
I had a discussion almost ten years ago regarding Shaul Eisenberg, Beijing and Marc Rich with Barry Chamish with a glance to Denise's father of the name Eisenberg. Something about Chins in a Shanghai phone book.
Is this internet infatuation with Arnon Milchan a Jooz-Killed-JFK thing.
As in Sirhan-Killed-RFK--the kind of deflection practiced by E. Howard Hunt in re LBJ-Killed-JFK.
There's a separate discussion which could be had, more accurately does Israel have a right to nuclear arms? Iran? India? Pakistan? U.S.?
A Mossad which both killed JFK and brought on the JFK Act is one more schizophrenic than our own lobotomites at Langley.
In my early examination of the five volumes of Douglas Horne's Inside the ARRB I note Custer's Last X-Ray:
Douglas Horne, Inside the Assassinations Record Review Board, Volume II, Chapter Five: The Autopsy X-Rays, pages 530-2:
Custer Examines the X-Rays of the Body
The noteworthy highlights of Custer's review of the x-rays of the body was Jeremy's attempt to see whether Custer could identify metal fragments near any of the cervical vertebrae, which Custer had mentioned earlier in the deposition.
Jeremy showed Custer x-ray no. 9, a view of the chest prior to removal of the lungs, and the exchange went as follows:
Gunn: Previously, you referred to there being metal fragments in the cervical area. Are you able to identify any metal fragments in this x-ray?
Custer: Not in this film.
Gunn: Does this film include a view or an exposure that would have included such metal fragments?
Custer: No sir.
Gunn: Where would the metal fragments be located?
Custer: Further up in there. This region.
Gunn: Can youand you're pointing to?
Custer: Up into the, I'd say, C3/C4 region.
Jeremy asked Custer to review x-rays no. 8 and 10, of the right shoulder and chest, and left shoulder and chest, respectivelyboth are images following the removal of the heart and lungs. Custer could not identify metal fragments in either x-ray.
Later, Jeremy asked Custer the following questions:
Gunn: Now, you had raised, previously in the deposition. . .the possibility of some metal fragments in the C3/C4 range.
Custer: I noticed I didn't see that.
Gunn: You didn't see any x-rays that would be inthat would include the C3/C4 area?
Custer: No sir.
Gunn: Are you certain that you took x-rays that included theincluded C3 and C4?
Custer: Yes, sir. Absolutely.
Gunn: How many x-rays did you take that would have included that?
Custer: Just one. And that was all that was necessary, because it showedright there.
Gunn: And what, as best you recall, did it show?
Custer: A fragmentation of a shell in and around that circular exitthat area. Let me rephrase that. I don't want to say "exit," because I don't know whether it was exit or entrance. But all I can say, there was bullet fragmentations [sic] around that areathat opening.
Gunn: Around C3/C4?
Custer: Right.
Gunn" And do you recall how many fragments there were?
Custer: Not really. There was enough. It was very prevalent.
Gunn: Did anyone make any observations about metal fragments in the C3/C4 area?
Custer: I did. And I was told to mind my own business. That's where I was shut down again.
Gunn: You have, during the course of this deposition, identified three x-rays that you are quite certain that you took, but don't appear in this collection. Are there any others that you can identify as not being included?
Custer: That's the only three that come to my mind right now; the two tangential views, and the A-P cervical spine.
Gunn: Okay.
Custer: Can I add something to that?
Gunn: Sure.
Custer: In my own opinion, I do believe, basically, the reason why they are not here is because they showed massive amounts of bullet fragments.
~~~
I had a discussion almost ten years ago regarding Shaul Eisenberg, Beijing and Marc Rich with Barry Chamish with a glance to Denise's father of the name Eisenberg. Something about Chins in a Shanghai phone book.
Is this internet infatuation with Arnon Milchan a Jooz-Killed-JFK thing.
As in Sirhan-Killed-RFK--the kind of deflection practiced by E. Howard Hunt in re LBJ-Killed-JFK.
There's a separate discussion which could be had, more accurately does Israel have a right to nuclear arms? Iran? India? Pakistan? U.S.?
A Mossad which both killed JFK and brought on the JFK Act is one more schizophrenic than our own lobotomites at Langley.
