Explosion Norway

[Jan Klimkowski]

One of the Daily Telegraph's anonymous "sources" claims to have helped Breivik join the freemasons.

:gossip: That last has set my antennae twitching. Where would the Telegraph have obtained such a confidential, intimate, source?

My instinct is that this is a deliberate leaking of information into the public domain, potentially by British intelligence. NB a lot of this went on in the case of the British spy found dead in the sports bag in an MI6 safehouse.

So, taking a look at that specific information:

A friend, who did not wish to be named but who had helped him join the Freemasons, said: "He had many friends but I remember he lost all of his money on the stock market in 1997. He lost shares worth about 2 million kroner (£227,000).

"He always took care of his mother and she was very dependent on him."

So, are intelligence sources attempting to slur Breivik with the "mother's boy" slur?

Another friend disclosed that the right wing extremist had travelled to the US for plastic surgery on his face.

He said: "He had surgery on his forehead, nose and chin and said he was very satisfied with the results.

"I never saw him with a woman but he used to say that he would start dating again once he had fixed his face. He always wanted to be rich."

Are intelligence sources attempting to create the legend of a vain, shallow and self-obsessed man?

In my judgement, these leaks to the Telegraph provide corroborating evidence to the hypothesis that Breivik was either a British intelligence asset, or directly handled by British intelligence.

I'm bumping this because, on reflection, I consider it even more significant than I when I originally posted it.

I think we're being played here.

The Telegraph's anonymous sources (quite possibly British intelligence) are painting a picture of Breivik as a vain, self-obsessed, mother's boy.

Analogous character assassinations were perpetrated in the Gareth Williams case, where the anonymous sources continue to attempt to portray Williams as a cross-dressing, sado-masochistic, sexual freak. See eg here. The testimony of his friends disproves the spook case comprehensively.

Back to Breivik.

Based on what we know, Breivik is a cold, calculating killer who personally obtained the ingredients to manufacture dum-dum bullets which he called "chemical weapons", designed to "decimate", annihilate, the next generation of "cultural Marxists".

Or, outside his warped ideological mission: to slaughter scared, crying, children.

Meanwhile, these anonymous "sources" of the Telegraph claim such intimate knowledge that they arranged for this "mummy's boy" to join the freemasons and stage whisper that he had plastic surgery in America not to change his appearance as part of his "mission", but because he was "vain" and couldn't get laid.

I call Bullshit.

Who is "Richard", Breivik's British "mentor", or handler?

What are the links between "Richard" and Serb gun runners in Monrovia, Liberia?

How was Breivik chosen, at the age of 22-23, if his account is to be believed, to be a Justiciar Knight of the reconstituted Knights Templar Europe?

Breivik is a Mechanic. Quite possibly a sleeper. A programmed Mechanic whose trigger was just pulled.

Once again, note the change of language when Breivik's atrocious mission is determined.

More excerpts from Breivik's Knights Templar log, with my comments following.

It has been decided that the operation will be effectuated in Autumn, 2011. However, I cannot go into factors concerning why, at this point. My current funds are running low, and I have less than 15 000 Euro left with a 30 000 credit backup from my 10 different credit cards. My primary funds should cover all planned expenses without spending any of the credit.

"It has been decided the operation" will take place in Autumn 2011.

Again the curious sentence construction.

Not "I, the single Perfect Knight working alone, have decided that the operation will take place in Autumn 2011".

But "it has been decided".

By who?

Who determined the time, location and targets of Breivik's ghastly crime?