Explosion Norway

[Peter Lemkin]

Crude translation of article from the Norwegian newspaper Klassekampen [Class Warfare]:

Planed Propaganda Campaign: Anders Behring Breivik want to use the legal case against him as a propaganda push against the "treason of cultural-marxistists".

By Johan Brox klassekampen@klassekampen.no
Monday 25 July, 2011
"Remember, the right case is (from our point of view) not against you, but rather a lawsuit against the regime", types Anders Behring Breivik, the man who is accused of having blown up the government building and executed 86 young people on Utøya, in its manifesto.
He published the manifesto on the Internet shortly before he detonated the bomb at the government buildings. Parts of the writings are copied from the American Uni-bomber's manifesto from 1995.
In its guidelines, Breivik describes how terrorist actions should best be performed and how the legal case later can be turned into include a PR show for Breivik's extreme right program.
Breivik is waiting to be found guilty of muder. He shall, however, have declared himself innocent of the crimes, because killing in his opinion is possible to justify the struggle against Islam and Western Society and Culture. He will tell the court that the murder of 92 innocent people was "self-defense, through pre-emptive strikes."
In the legal case, Breivik will demand that Parliament gives up control of the country to a Council of "the 20 most dedicated and reliable conservative / patriotic leaders in the country." He will require enough time to establish martial law and a loyal army of about 2,000 soldiers.
Breivik shows considerable self-insight in the manifesto: "When you are finished presenting your requirements to the judges and the public for all to judge, laugh your ass off and you deign to be ridiculous."
All this will be Breivik's biggest worry, how to let the long-term message seep in.
"By presenting the following accusations demands the utmost seriousness, prepares all of us who listen to the conflicts and scenarios to come. They will laugh now, but in the back allies of simple minds they will have a bit of fear, respect, and admiration for our cause - and the alternative authority we are. "
All Breivik's movements confirm that he is following the guidelines in his own manifesto to the letter. The actual terrorist attack was also completely in line with Brevik's program.
- He surrendered without resistance to police, to get a trial.
- He has declared to be behind the terrorist attack.
- He asked for an open prison meeting, to broadcast his program.
- He asked for a specific lawyer, Geir Lippe City, to defend himself.

The declaration mentions Breivik urged his like-minded fellows to look actively for "nationalist-oriented" laws.
The lawyer needs not agree with Breivik's methods (mass murder), but must be "willing to help you ideologically" by, and among other things give the terrorist a Templar uniform he can wear during the court case in building a case against the "regime".
Lippe City has previously been known for his defense of Ole Nicolai Kvisler, who in 2001 was convicted of the racially motivated murder of Benjamin Hermansen.
Klassekampen has not yet succeeded in getting a comment from Lippe City about what he thinks about ideas characterized by Breivik, or whether he will go on Breivik's claim. NRK said Lippe City does not know why Breivk asked that he about defend him.
One of Breivik's claims to a proper trial is to allow Breivik to read long, detailed, polemical introductory and final statements to the court.
He compares himself with Sitting Bull and other Native American Warriors who fought against foreign imperialists. Breivik think all Muslims want to introduce Sharia, and that it is a Christian's duty to fight against this.
The way he sees it, Europe has been in civil war since 1999, when western NATO troops fought against the Christian Serbs to defend Muslim Kosovo Albanians. He envisions a three-phased war where Muslims will gradually spread to account for half of Europe's population by 2083.
Several on the extreme right who have beenasked why he attacked the "Norwegians", and not directly at Muslims. Brevik responded to this in his manifesto: The way he sees it, the Muslim "beasts", can not distinguish between right and wrong. Nor should Christians go to attack the "multiculturalists" and other westerners that allow Muslim immigration, writes Breivik.