03-08-2011, 01:14 PM
I'm having trouble figuring out all the details of the Ted Kaczynski / Unabomber case. There seems to be only one source for the Deep Political theory regarding the case and that source is madly disorganized. http://www.unabombers.com Perhaps some forum members can help me answer some questions, such as: 1) It seems to be undisputed that Ted Kaczynski was an MK Ultra experimentation victim in the late 1950's. Even so, I do not understand what that has to do with him being a patsy for the bombings. That is, I don't see how MK Ultra could have made him a more effective or easier patsy. It seems his writings about the environment are truely heart-felt by him. Does anyone suggest his environmental views originated from MK Ultra? If not, I do not see the connection unless it was MK Ultra that discovered these views at age 16. 2) Who is Daniel C Pride? On the Unabomber web site, Pride claims some of the Unabomber handwriting belongs to himself. How did that happen? 3) On this Unabomber web site, there are hints that some people know who actually committed the bombings. Is this true? Who is he and what is the evidence? From where did that evidence come? 4) What made Ted Kaczynski a better patsy than any other person i.e., what made him stand out from all the others? Was it simple coincidence that CIA/Mosad spooks knew him from MK Ultra and that he also dropped out of main stream society? 5) Is the evidence against Kaczynski so thin that the government feared going to trial? Is that why he got railroaded into a plea he did not authorize? 6) 15 years later, why are there no JFK style books exposing this false-flag attack? Thank you for any light to be shed on this subject.