08-08-2011, 10:32 PM
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:I certainly would like an explanation as to what the material is and where it comes from...Rather, it seems you don't like the explanation as to what the material is and where it comes from which you've been presented with, so you're choosing to ignore it, despite your inability to offer any alternative explanations. Sure, there were unfortunately only four samples of dust used in the study, but lots of samples of the active thermitic material found in the dust. Also, lots of samples of byproducts of reacted thermitic martial found not only in the dust samples examined in the Harrit et al. study, but also those conducted by the USGS and RJ Lee. Can you not muster any better response to this convergence of evidence than abject denial?