09-08-2011, 12:26 PM
Lemkin,
Wrong. I my purpose may be to case doubt in the minds of people who have been clinging to false beliefs... such as yourself. But the intent is not to fracture the movement and cause dissension, but rather to more accurately describe what happened to the towers.
I do not claim a spontaneous collapse. There had to have been energy inputs to alter the static balance of the structures to cause them to collapse. This could be properly placed explosions or some mechanism for weakening the columns which provided the axial support for not only themselves but for all the building components and mass and of course the occupants and furniture etc.
Whatever caused or initiated the collapse it became a progressive destruction which lasted about 11-14 seconds. You want to believe that it was hundreds or thousands of explosion over that interval. You would be wrong in that belief.
The imitating cause could and likely was not ONLY the plane damage and the fires which they caused. But once the first proverbial domino tipped, the others simply cannot resist. I understand that you and others can't seem to accept that a global collapse of such magnitude is possibly a progressive process. But in fact, it is and that has some rather interesting implications for who did it and how it could have been done.
I suggest you spend a few days reading the 911 Free Forums where this research can be found.
Wrong. I my purpose may be to case doubt in the minds of people who have been clinging to false beliefs... such as yourself. But the intent is not to fracture the movement and cause dissension, but rather to more accurately describe what happened to the towers.
I do not claim a spontaneous collapse. There had to have been energy inputs to alter the static balance of the structures to cause them to collapse. This could be properly placed explosions or some mechanism for weakening the columns which provided the axial support for not only themselves but for all the building components and mass and of course the occupants and furniture etc.
Whatever caused or initiated the collapse it became a progressive destruction which lasted about 11-14 seconds. You want to believe that it was hundreds or thousands of explosion over that interval. You would be wrong in that belief.
The imitating cause could and likely was not ONLY the plane damage and the fires which they caused. But once the first proverbial domino tipped, the others simply cannot resist. I understand that you and others can't seem to accept that a global collapse of such magnitude is possibly a progressive process. But in fact, it is and that has some rather interesting implications for who did it and how it could have been done.
I suggest you spend a few days reading the 911 Free Forums where this research can be found.