15-08-2011, 08:52 AM
Richard Clarke Only Proves that 9/11 Blogger is LIHOP Disinfo
Posted on August 14, 2011 by willyloman
by Scott Creighton
Scroll down the front page of 9/11 Blogger (once the flagship website for the Truth movement and now an empty shell of it's former self populated by LIHOP sock-puppets aka supporters of the Official Conspiracy Theory) and the ONLY articles you see are about the Richard Clarke "revelation" that the decision was made in the upper ranks of the CIA (George Tenet) to keep information about the future hijackers from the FBI and the White House and everyone else that supposedly would have acted to stop the attacks of 9/11. Apparently the story goes something like this:
The CIA was attempting to recruit the al Qaeda terrorists for some project or another and therefore they were in the country. That effort failed and the CIA did not inform anyone that they were around which Clarke then says would have been useful information that the FBI could have used to stop 9/11 from occurring.
If anyone thinks they have heard this story before, you're right. It's already the official version of what happened in the "defense/intelligence failures" that supposedly led up to 9/11. This of course is how they justified creating the Department of Homeland Security so long ago to serve as the central hub of intelligence gathering and processing so that things like this didn't happen again. This aspect of the story is certainly not news.
The notion that the CIA was trying to "recruit" the al Qaeda operatives is the only new twist to Richard Clarke's latest effort to prop-up the official story's failing opinion ratings. Back in 2001 not many people understood how the US worked with and even created al Qaeda. But that isn't the case now. Most Americans understand that the CIA has been using this shadowy group for destabilization campaigns for decades. Hell, now they have an office in Washington DC since they are closely affiliated with the fake "rebels" in Libya.
Seems to me Clarke is trying to explain away the fact that the CIA (and the FBI by the way since two of the alleged hijackers lived with an FBI informant for a year or so) had close contact with these men. Clearly they were setting them up to be the patsies but according to Clarke, this is one of the first times the CIA approached a group of angry Muslims and did not get them to blow something up for them. They also seem to have left them to their own devices here in the states after the failed attempt which of course defies all credibility.
The fact that this obvious spin-job of Clarke's is pasted all over 9/11 Blogger as "news" goes to show you how far Blogger has fallen down the Cass Sunstein psyop hole. The film was made by the same two guys who produced Press For Truth, a film that finishes out by claiming it was Pakistan who attacked us on 9/11. Pakistan folks. Who does that "revelation" serve these days?
This is Jon Gold style LIHOP at it's best, full of evil Muslims, scary terrorists, and renewed calls for even more Homeland Security intel industrial complex cooperation. It has no business being seriously debated on a Truth site of any kind. Gretavo over at WTCdemoliton, one of the last real Truth advocacy sites, copied one of the threads for posterity sake so that in the future we could all look back and evaluate the "contributions" of all the various sock-puppet personae inhabiting Blogger these days.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/08/...p-disinfo/
Posted on August 14, 2011 by willyloman
by Scott Creighton
Scroll down the front page of 9/11 Blogger (once the flagship website for the Truth movement and now an empty shell of it's former self populated by LIHOP sock-puppets aka supporters of the Official Conspiracy Theory) and the ONLY articles you see are about the Richard Clarke "revelation" that the decision was made in the upper ranks of the CIA (George Tenet) to keep information about the future hijackers from the FBI and the White House and everyone else that supposedly would have acted to stop the attacks of 9/11. Apparently the story goes something like this:
The CIA was attempting to recruit the al Qaeda terrorists for some project or another and therefore they were in the country. That effort failed and the CIA did not inform anyone that they were around which Clarke then says would have been useful information that the FBI could have used to stop 9/11 from occurring.
If anyone thinks they have heard this story before, you're right. It's already the official version of what happened in the "defense/intelligence failures" that supposedly led up to 9/11. This of course is how they justified creating the Department of Homeland Security so long ago to serve as the central hub of intelligence gathering and processing so that things like this didn't happen again. This aspect of the story is certainly not news.
The notion that the CIA was trying to "recruit" the al Qaeda operatives is the only new twist to Richard Clarke's latest effort to prop-up the official story's failing opinion ratings. Back in 2001 not many people understood how the US worked with and even created al Qaeda. But that isn't the case now. Most Americans understand that the CIA has been using this shadowy group for destabilization campaigns for decades. Hell, now they have an office in Washington DC since they are closely affiliated with the fake "rebels" in Libya.
Seems to me Clarke is trying to explain away the fact that the CIA (and the FBI by the way since two of the alleged hijackers lived with an FBI informant for a year or so) had close contact with these men. Clearly they were setting them up to be the patsies but according to Clarke, this is one of the first times the CIA approached a group of angry Muslims and did not get them to blow something up for them. They also seem to have left them to their own devices here in the states after the failed attempt which of course defies all credibility.
The fact that this obvious spin-job of Clarke's is pasted all over 9/11 Blogger as "news" goes to show you how far Blogger has fallen down the Cass Sunstein psyop hole. The film was made by the same two guys who produced Press For Truth, a film that finishes out by claiming it was Pakistan who attacked us on 9/11. Pakistan folks. Who does that "revelation" serve these days?
This is Jon Gold style LIHOP at it's best, full of evil Muslims, scary terrorists, and renewed calls for even more Homeland Security intel industrial complex cooperation. It has no business being seriously debated on a Truth site of any kind. Gretavo over at WTCdemoliton, one of the last real Truth advocacy sites, copied one of the threads for posterity sake so that in the future we could all look back and evaluate the "contributions" of all the various sock-puppet personae inhabiting Blogger these days.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2011/08/...p-disinfo/
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"