Fetzer's Onion - Half Baked

[Peter Lemkin]

Bill, correct me if I'm wrong [or my memory faulty], but back in the 'old days' before John Simkin was exposed as part of the problem, rather than part of the solution, you were of the mind that there were many fewer discrepancies, mutually exclusive 'facts' and 'evidence' in the 911 matter than you now seem to 'allow'. You are making progress, IMO...and given your great work on Dallas, am sure in the end you will be a champion of the major thrust of the true events and the real coverups. I don't agree 100% with Jim Fetzer [and I could name others in the 911 Truth movement] on all things. But, I think he has distilled down most of the important events and non-events [false cover events or propaganda lies]. It is a much more [IMHO] complex matter than Dallas was and despite the advances in communication, internet and computers it will still take us some time to reach a general consensus. In the meantime, each of us may entertain some ideas/theories that to others seem outlandish. I do feel, however, that there is a growing consensus among the researchers and those following 911 carefully. There are OF COURSE both human and logical mistakes being made - as well as disinformation, false and blind alleys, traps being carefully laid to discredit and discourage us....as in Dallas and so many other such ops. Let us all persevere and approximate, the best we can, what happened and what did not happen [and why / by whom]. I, myself, have entertained certain sub-theories and then rejected them; others I have accepted and hold fast to them. New information is coming in all the time. The sheer amount of information available [as well as the sheer amounts of information being withheld] are staggering. In the end, if it is not too late, we may have a GUT [Grant Unified Theory]....for now we have several, but overlapping and all pointing in the same general directions and away from the same totally false 'official fiction'. Sadly, out Nation is now guided in its foreign and other polices by this fiction. Many in the general population are fooled or too confused to entertain alternatives coherently. I think Jim's analysis is apt and pretty much 'on the mark', if not yet a bullseye. We have not yet even reached that point with Dallas, but we HAVE indeed come a long way on that one. The same will happen with 911, I'm sure. The stakes, IMO, are higher, although the M.O. [generally], motivations [generally] and players [very loosely] were sadly the same or similar. :darthvader:

As for the layered 'onion' analogy, it seems to me that goes back over a hundred years or more...someone look in the OED.