27-08-2011, 03:44 AM
Thank you for posting this article and the review by Erik Larson who, by the way has been an active debunker of the CIT work which essentially concludes that the plane flew OVER the pentagon and not INTO it. THE CIT work is compelling and those who refuse to acknowledge its merits essentially support the government explanation that a wide bodied jet slammed into the pentagon with hardly a bit of evidence to substantiate this claim except some apparently falsified RADES data and some apparently staged knocked over light poles. But that's a whole other story.
What strikes me as interesting in the whole CIA, FBI, NSA, NORAD and NEADS *complicity* in the event is that there is a presumption that the four commercial airliners struck the towers, the pentagon and crashed into Shankesville... with the first two being the proximate cause of the twin towers' collapse and the damage leading to the fires that caused bldg 7 to come down as well.
There is reasonable doubt that it was the alleged commercial flights that struck the towers... see the work of Pilots for 911Truth and that there may have been devices placed within the towers which were what caused them to collapse. If this is true then the complicity of the intel agencies is only part of the story. PFT raises the notion that the commercial flights did NOT strike the towers nor the pentagon... then what DID happen to those flights? It's still conceivable that Col Mars could have prevented even the substitute planes from hotting their targets or doing whatever they were intended to do... which at the very minimum was to provide the 19 hijackers dunnit scenario... AND allow perhaps some military jets to deliver more *bang* to the towers that the impact of a fuel laden wide bodied commercial airliner could. These *substitute* jet planes could have conceivably delivered all the energy required to take the towers down... (note one of the firefighters described the jet hitting the south tower as black.... not the silver of an AA or the gray of a UAL plane.) This MAY account for the destruction of the twin towers, but not for Bldg 7 unless it can be shown that fire could weaken the steel to cause the core to collapse and pull the rest of the building with it.
All this doesn't preclude the notion that the perps had to create a credible case of the AQ hijackers having done 911 on the own and create patsies to take the heat. The excuse is always that they are infiltrating these groups with double agents to monitor their activities... while at the same time literally providing all the expertise and *weapons* etc. for their various attacks... which effectively make them *false flag* attacks since *we* are the creators of these events. And of course we know that a false flag is undertaken to sway the public in support of major *aggressive* policy decisions which in the case of 911 was to grab control of ME oil/energy at the very least and to take out Iraq and Iran which were supposed threats to our ally - Israel. In this light 911 was largely successful as we jumped into two and now three or four ME wars and poured trillions into the MIC for the foreseeable future to *secure our national interests*.
It certainly could be argued that the CIA is an secret foreign policy action group of the *executive* which operates largely in secret while posing as a spy agency listening and watching for threats to the USA. Under this rubrick it makes sense that that *intel* would conduct false flags, terrorist plots and attacks which would be used to drive the *elected* government to produce the policies that *intel* or their masters/controllers desired.
CIA, FBI, and NSA apparently lie under oath and consider the themselves above and beyond the reach of the law.. and they have the power to control and keep everything secret from congressional inquires.
The Fenton account is revelatory, but it seems unlikely that any investigation will be able to bring this rogue agencies to heel. In fact, it seems unlikely that congress would even consider such an investigation as they are pretty much controlled by the same interests which control intel.
This is a Brave New World....
What strikes me as interesting in the whole CIA, FBI, NSA, NORAD and NEADS *complicity* in the event is that there is a presumption that the four commercial airliners struck the towers, the pentagon and crashed into Shankesville... with the first two being the proximate cause of the twin towers' collapse and the damage leading to the fires that caused bldg 7 to come down as well.
There is reasonable doubt that it was the alleged commercial flights that struck the towers... see the work of Pilots for 911Truth and that there may have been devices placed within the towers which were what caused them to collapse. If this is true then the complicity of the intel agencies is only part of the story. PFT raises the notion that the commercial flights did NOT strike the towers nor the pentagon... then what DID happen to those flights? It's still conceivable that Col Mars could have prevented even the substitute planes from hotting their targets or doing whatever they were intended to do... which at the very minimum was to provide the 19 hijackers dunnit scenario... AND allow perhaps some military jets to deliver more *bang* to the towers that the impact of a fuel laden wide bodied commercial airliner could. These *substitute* jet planes could have conceivably delivered all the energy required to take the towers down... (note one of the firefighters described the jet hitting the south tower as black.... not the silver of an AA or the gray of a UAL plane.) This MAY account for the destruction of the twin towers, but not for Bldg 7 unless it can be shown that fire could weaken the steel to cause the core to collapse and pull the rest of the building with it.
All this doesn't preclude the notion that the perps had to create a credible case of the AQ hijackers having done 911 on the own and create patsies to take the heat. The excuse is always that they are infiltrating these groups with double agents to monitor their activities... while at the same time literally providing all the expertise and *weapons* etc. for their various attacks... which effectively make them *false flag* attacks since *we* are the creators of these events. And of course we know that a false flag is undertaken to sway the public in support of major *aggressive* policy decisions which in the case of 911 was to grab control of ME oil/energy at the very least and to take out Iraq and Iran which were supposed threats to our ally - Israel. In this light 911 was largely successful as we jumped into two and now three or four ME wars and poured trillions into the MIC for the foreseeable future to *secure our national interests*.
It certainly could be argued that the CIA is an secret foreign policy action group of the *executive* which operates largely in secret while posing as a spy agency listening and watching for threats to the USA. Under this rubrick it makes sense that that *intel* would conduct false flags, terrorist plots and attacks which would be used to drive the *elected* government to produce the policies that *intel* or their masters/controllers desired.
CIA, FBI, and NSA apparently lie under oath and consider the themselves above and beyond the reach of the law.. and they have the power to control and keep everything secret from congressional inquires.
The Fenton account is revelatory, but it seems unlikely that any investigation will be able to bring this rogue agencies to heel. In fact, it seems unlikely that congress would even consider such an investigation as they are pretty much controlled by the same interests which control intel.
This is a Brave New World....