ROBERT HANSON - Anatomy of a Disinformationalist

[Edward Prichard]

I don't believe it because it's just not supported by the evidence.

Why would the SS kill Kennedy in broad daylight and in front of witnesses when the CIA had a chemical that could have been added to his food, caused a heart attack and left no trace of itself in his bloodstream ?

Generalities will not do. See above exhibits, testimony, and literature that supports it, and tell me why specifically, in your view they do not. And what of the work of Newcomb / Adams and Horne? You seem to be tiptoeing around their investigations.

The answer to your question has already been provided--SA Greer's alleged actions were perhaps an improvisation or "plan B" when the sniper team failed. SAIC Kellerman and SA Greer's recorded actions in the Zapruder Film certainly make it appear that way, don't they?

Further, the JFK assassination was perhaps designed to have a broader effect than just the elimination of the executive. Would you not concur that perhaps the CIA desired to frame the leftist to justify another invasion of Cuba and understood that a heart attack would not suffice?

Frankly, I'm surprised that such elemental questions are being asked. It as if IQs suddenly drop when the Greer theory is raised.

This exchange serves only to underscore my earlier point that the theory is "radioactive". There must be truth to it, for their certainly seems to be a "conspiracy" to dispense with it as quickly as possible--even at the risk of appearing illogical, ignorant, hypocritical, and downright rude.