Treason in America by Antoine Chaitkin

[Linda Minor]

The Issue of Synarchism
Nonetheless, the fact persists, that, to all intents,
when the fact of that crash is put, hypothetically, momentarily
to one side, the present trend in international
and nations’ internal affairs, is showing all the principal
economic and related symptoms of an oncoming form
of what became known as fascism in 1920s Italy, and
what had been actually developed in 19th-Century
France under the name of the “synarchist” movement.
That was the synarchist movement which had developed
about the close of the 1860s and beginning of
the 1870s. That form of synarchism which was recognized
as “fascism,” was originally introduced, later, as
a label for the form of synarchism which the British
asset and Venetian financier, veteran of London’s
“Young Turk” operation, Volpi di Misurata, brought
into Italy during the early 1920s. The selection of the
trade-style “fascism” as a name for a synarchist scheme
in 1922 Italy then, was a choice based on the intent to
present an obvious appeal to memory of the legendary
Roman imperial legions. In turn, Nazism was the intentionally
Wagnerian-flavored brand-name supplied to
bring the so-called fascist model of synarchism from
Italy, into Germany, and also back into the occupation
of France. That French government was, frankly, the
synarchist formation which had arranged the victory of
the Wehrmacht over what was, technically, a relatively
superior military force of the French nation.

It is important to recognize the symptoms of fascism
of which Prescott Bush would have been proud, in cases
such as the 2001 inauguration of his worse than foolish
grandson, President George W. Bush, Jr.
The importance of emphasizing this Bush heritage,
is that we should recall, that, after the 1929 U.S. stockmarket
“crash,” what had become known as fascism
during the 1920s was about to take over in the United
States. Fascism would have taken over the U.S.A. then,
but for the election and inauguration of President Franklin
Roosevelt.

The right-wing, anti-Roosevelt movement
led by the Wall Street financier interests during
the 1930s, was intended to achieve a fascist takeover of
the U.S. government, even by an intended military seizure
of power by Wall Street interests. The same trend
toward fascism has been clearly expressed recently in
President George H.W. Bush’s collusion with British
Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the matter of Germany’s
reunification. It is to be recognized, recently, in
the two successive terms of President George W. Bush,
Jr., that the Bush impulse toward creating a new fascist
system has persisted, inside the U.S.A. and elsewhere
today; the policies of “bail out” and “stimulus” of recent
cases, such as those of the Bush Administration and the
often simian-like antics of U.S. Democratic Representative
Barney Frank, have typified this trend.

It is important to recall, that during the interval of
the 1920s and 1930s, fascism had become an active
force inside London itself, even into the ranks of the
monarchy. This included the official British fascists’
role as a spin-off from the Fabian Society of H.G. Wells
and his ilk, and as also expressed, nakedly, in the
avowed 1937 intention of John Maynard Keynes. This
pattern in the 1930s had been preceded by efforts introduced,
also from London, into the U.S.A. through Wall
Street and related circles, as introduced by Wall Street
and related sympathies for Mussolini and Hitler, by the
leading adversaries of what Franklin Roosevelt represented,
during both the 1920s and 1930s. Not surprisingly,
this pattern continued throughout the 1930s, up
to the time of Italy’s joining the Wehrmacht “Blitzkrieg”
in France; a moment when Britain’s Winston
Churchill had deftly abandoned his adopted Italian protege,
Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini.

Today, we must recognize the current influence of
the same synarchist trend in the U.S. circles which had
been associated with circles of the faithful followers of
the tradition of Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and
Woodrow Wilson. Those two U.S. Presidents were
second-generation products of the British-directed Confederacy’s
attempt to destroy the U.S.A.; they were, in
historical fact, traitors of the type which also qualified as
later supporters of the same synarchist tradition also expressed
by the 1920s Italian and German sympathizers
of Mussolini and Hitler. London’s assets reigning in
Wall Street, constituted a nest of such enemies of the
United States’ Constitution during the 1920s and 1930s,
including names from among those of the circles of the
principal targets of the 1930s Pecora Commission investigations.
Prescott Bush, the London-steered man
who was assigned to release the Anglo-American funds
to assist Adolf Hitler into power, had committed that act
on behalf of his employers (both the Bank of England’s
Montagu Norman and Brown Brothers, Harriman), who
were leading members of the same pack from among
leading Anglo-American backers of fascism.

For most relevant, ironical reasons, the 1941 attack
on Pearl Harbor by the Japan which had been a British
ally against the U.S.A. since no later than 1894, turned
out to be a momentary great embarrassment for the anglophile,
pro-fascist, Wall Street enemies of President
Franklin Roosevelt’s 1930s and early 1940s U.S.A.;
but, those European and U.S. fascist enemies of President
Franklin Roosevelt remained a credible force, despite
their embarrassment over the Pearl Harbor attack.
They remained an active political force in the background
throughout the 1942-1945 period. They reappeared
on the streets in newly chosen habitual guises,
returning to the surface of visibly leading positions of
influence, from about the time of the events at Normandy
in June 1944. With the death of President Franklin
Roosevelt and the inauguration of President Harry
Truman, the lurking fascist circles inside the U.S.A.
slid into a nearly controlling political position in the
U.S.A., throughout the terms of the Truman Administration,
and have remained a stubbornly persisting, and
growing, Wall Street related factor, as they have been
since the riots of 1968 and the election of President
Nixon, until now.

It was not only fascist nations of the past, but, rather,
the persistence of this presently global, fascist threat,
which has been a principal factor in world politics since
the interval of London’s appointment of Napoleon III to
reign as London’s agent over France. The source of the
threat, in whatever nation it has arisen as a ruling political
influence, was never spontaneous. During this
time, synarchism, fascism, and their offshoots, have
always remained essentially a disease spread to other
nations by the British Empire, as it had been when the
British Foreign Office’s Lord Palmerston inserted his
asset, Napoleon III, into the government of France.