08-09-2011, 02:55 AM
As I understand it, one of the pinnacle controversies about the destruction of WTC1&2 has to do with nanothermite. Arguments have been proffered, and a peer-revieqwed paper has been published. Arguments have ensued hither and fro, back and forth.
My simple questions for anyone who has delved more deeply into this matter than I are these :
Presumably multiple sources from several independent locations of assays of dust have produced signs, remnants, etc. of nanothermite.
How and where is this documented and verified?
Has this information been published? or is it being held in covert absentia to protect sources (and further samples) and save it for some forthcoming legal process?
If so, who is in possession of (knows the location of) this information?
Are there any other or additional assurances as to the validity and veracity of this material, the chain of possession, etc?
My simple questions for anyone who has delved more deeply into this matter than I are these :
Presumably multiple sources from several independent locations of assays of dust have produced signs, remnants, etc. of nanothermite.
How and where is this documented and verified?
Has this information been published? or is it being held in covert absentia to protect sources (and further samples) and save it for some forthcoming legal process?
If so, who is in possession of (knows the location of) this information?
Are there any other or additional assurances as to the validity and veracity of this material, the chain of possession, etc?
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"