08-09-2011, 05:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2011, 05:41 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Evica's theory is somewhat brilliant. It suggests the conspiracy acted like some narcotics or venoms act on the receptors by overwhelming them with an overload of messages. That way the real poison is not detectable within the flood of potential causes.
I don't want to draw laughter by comparing myself to Evica, but I did notice we both came to the same conclusion about Oswald feeling he would be freed by the evidence, once it was known, and that Oswald was maintaining his role in the police station. Evica picked-up exactly what I picked-up, that the Dallas police were cooperating in making the case collapse against Oswald. This all ended with Oswald's murder.
What bothers me about the Evica model is that the model itself could be used to undervalue the real role of some sponsors, facilitators, or operators. In that case the model itself might be a 'false sponsor' of sorts.
.
I don't want to draw laughter by comparing myself to Evica, but I did notice we both came to the same conclusion about Oswald feeling he would be freed by the evidence, once it was known, and that Oswald was maintaining his role in the police station. Evica picked-up exactly what I picked-up, that the Dallas police were cooperating in making the case collapse against Oswald. This all ended with Oswald's murder.
What bothers me about the Evica model is that the model itself could be used to undervalue the real role of some sponsors, facilitators, or operators. In that case the model itself might be a 'false sponsor' of sorts.
.