An Open Question about Nanothermite

[Peter Lemkin]

As I understand it, one of the pinnacle controversies about the destruction of WTC1&2 has to do with nanothermite. Arguments have been proffered, and a peer-revieqwed paper has been published. Arguments have ensued hither and fro, back and forth.


My simple questions for anyone who has delved more deeply into this matter than I are these :

Presumably multiple sources from several independent locations of assays of dust have produced signs, remnants, etc. of nanothermite.

YES

How and where is this documented and verified?

In the articles and elsewhere. Those who collected samples willing to testify.

Has this information been published? or is it being held in covert absentia to protect sources (and further samples) and save it for some forthcoming legal process?

YES

If so, who is in possession of (knows the location of) this information?

Publicly known, if not widely published.

Are there any other or additional assurances as to the validity and veracity of this material, the chain of possession, etc?

YES. While most of the dust was cleaned up and made to disappear, like the steel, there were ample samples and some [yet untested] still exists and is verified as WTC dust.

Q.E.D.